Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison
Compare performance (550 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (125,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover or Mitsubishi Outlander?
Land Rover Range Rover vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Range Rover
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Outlander is substantially cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 82,380 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more range – reaching up to 116 km, about 31 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Outlander
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 244 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.
Range Rover
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Outlander is slightly lighter – 2,156 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 348 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeably more boot space – 818 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 320 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries visibly more – 846 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 317 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £125,200
Land Rover Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Mitsubishi Outlander
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
Trunk capacity
498 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Payload
453 - 529 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.