Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (455 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (49200 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Mitsubishi Outlander?
XC60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Outlander has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6343 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Outlander performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 85 km, about 3 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Outlander
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 149 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 3 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC60 performs slight better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
XC60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is minimal lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers barely noticeable more room – 495 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1543 L, which is about 139 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander barely noticeable takes the win – 595 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mitsubishi Outlander holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Volvo XC60
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £42,800
Mitsubishi Outlander
Volvo XC60
5 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Mitsubishi Outlander
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Volvo XC60
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
Price
42800 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
co2
19 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
|
Length
4708 mm
|
Length
4719 mm
|
|
Width
1902 mm
|
Width
1862 mm
|
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.