Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Land Rover Range Rover vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (615 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (122700 £ vs 275400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?
Range Rover
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Land Rover Range Rover has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 122700 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 152658 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L. The difference is about 13.30 L per 100 km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 615 HP compared to 600 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Rolls-Royce Cullinan pulls a bit stronger with 900 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Range Rover
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is minimal lighter – 2504 kg compared to 2660 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeable more room – 818 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 263 L.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover hardly perceptible takes the win – 846 kg compared to 840 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Land Rover Range Rover
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £122,700
Land Rover Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
Price
275400 - 324600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
Curb weight
2660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2047 mm
|
Width
2000 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
What drive types are available for the Land Rover Range Rover?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.