VS

Land Rover Range Rover vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (550 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (125,200 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Land Rover Range Rover or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Land Rover Range Rover vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • marginally more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Range Rover

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Land Rover Range Rover is significantly cheaper – starting at 125,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 150,172 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13.2 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers marginally more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 550 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers somewhat more torque with 900 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Range Rover

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is marginally lighter – 2,504 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more boot space – 818 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 263 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries barely more – 846 kg compared to 840 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 115 - 116 km
Land Rover Range Rover
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Land Rover Range Rover
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
62 - 267 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,047 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
645 - 846 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Land Rover
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.