Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 122700 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Land Rover Range Rover?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £. That’s a price difference of around 85894 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs minimal better – achieving up to 122 km, about 5 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a convincingly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 350 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs to a small extent better – reaching 261 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls clearly stronger with 800 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 820 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers slightly more room – 910 L compared to 818 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover performs minimal better – up to 2176 L, which is about 71 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover clearly perceptible takes the win – 846 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 283 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1870 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.