Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 122,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Land Rover Range Rover?
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kodiaq is significantly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 84,865 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers barely more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 5 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more power – delivering 615 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 350 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is significantly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 820 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more boot space – 910 L compared to 818 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries visibly more – 846 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 283 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
122,700 - 244,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.