VS

Lexus UX vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (199 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (38,700 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lexus UX or Skoda Fabia?

Lexus UX vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Lexus UX

4.6 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

UX

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Fabia is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Lexus UX costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,437 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Fabia uses 4.9 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Lexus UX with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus UX offers somewhat more power – delivering 199 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Lexus UX takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

UX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is noticeably lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,495 kg. The difference is around 352 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers somewhat more boot space – 380 L compared to 320 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lexus UX carries clearly more – 615 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 178 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
Lexus UX
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Lexus UX means deciding whether you prefer the LBX’s fresh, ultra-compact city focus or the UX’s established track record and slightly roomier cabin. I’ll compare size, efficiency, features and driving feel to help you pick the Lexus that best matches your …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Lexus UX
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lexus UX

The Lexus UX is a compact luxury crossover that blends sharp styling with a quiet, comfortable cabin, perfect for urban buyers who want premium feel without shouting about it. It rides with poise, serves up plush materials and thoughtful tech, and—while it won’t satisfy anyone chasing track thrills—it's a smart, stylish choice for everyday driving.

details
78811-lexusux250h2023005
78811-lexusux250h2023006
78811-lexusux250h2023008
76370-mc23-ux-reveal-018-high-jpg

Reviews Lexus UX

4.6 (6 Reviews)
rate
marjollet
10 Feb 2026, 16:56:36

After a Toyota Avensis D4D with a BMW engine, I chose the UX 250h F Sport Design and I'm very satisfied.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Norma
21 Dec 2025, 18:27:57

Lv my UX I live 10 miles outside Belfast do aloy of country driving to reach different places I go t

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Fabia means deciding if you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and SUV styling or a practical, roomy hatchback that maximises interior space and efficiency. I’ll compare driving feel, comfort, boot space, running costs and equipment to …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Fabia
VS
Comparing the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia helps you choose between a small crossover with raised ride height and SUV-like style, and a practical supermini that focuses on interior space, comfort and efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in driving feel, passenger and luggage room, …
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
The SEAT Ibiza brings snap, youthful styling and engaging handling that makes town driving feel like a mini hot hatch, while the Škoda Fabia answers with roomy practicality, clever storage and a smoother, more accomplished everyday ride. Pick the Ibiza if you want flair and fun; choose the Fabia if …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Honda Jazz
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Skoda Fabia means weighing clever, versatile practicality against composed, value-focused refinement. The Jazz shines with its Magic Seat flexibility and effortless city manners, while the Fabia offers a more polished cabin, sharper handling and often …
Lexus UX
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,700 - 54,100 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 127 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,495 - 1,555 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
283 - 320 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 615 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
199 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
146 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
1,987 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Lexus UX have?

The Lexus UX is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.