@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Lexus UX vs Mazda CX-30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Lexus UX or Mazda CX-30?

UX @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation

Lexus UX vs. Mazda CX-30: A Sophisticated Showdown in the Compact SUV Arena

The compact SUV segment has grown increasingly competitive, offering a diverse range of options for city dwellers and adventurers alike. Among the top contenders in this category are the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30. These models offer unique blends of style, performance, and innovation, catering to varying tastes and preferences. In this article, we delve into the features that set these two vehicles apart and highlight their technical strengths.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design and Dimensions

The Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30 share the SUV body type but express distinct design philosophies. The Lexus UX boasts a more modern, urban styling with dimensions of 4,495 mm in length, 1,840 mm in width, and 1,545 mm in height. This design emphasizes a sleek, aerodynamic silhouette that aligns with its reputation for luxury.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 exudes Mazda's Kodo design language, which blends elegance with a sporty demeanor. At 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,540 mm in height, the CX-30 is slightly more compact, making it easier to navigate tight city streets while maintaining a dynamic stance.

UX @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Lexus UX offers a choice between electric and full-hybrid engine types. The electric variant produces 204 HP with a seamless Reduction Gearbox transmission, while the hybrid option offers 199 HP with a CVT transmission. Both models are available in front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, prioritizing efficiency with consumption figures of 5-5.6 L/100 km for the hybrid and 16.7 kWh/100 km for the electric version. The electric UX achieves an impressive range of 449 km.

The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, is powered by a petrol mild-hybrid engine with outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. It provides both manual and automatic gearbox options, appealing to traditional driving enthusiasts and those seeking a more leisurely driving experience. The CX-30 impresses with slightly higher fuel consumption rates of 5.7-6.6 L/100 km but compensates with a robust maximum speed of up to 204 km/h, perfect for highway excursions.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Inside, the Lexus UX is optimized for luxury and comfort, offering a plush cabin with seating for four. Despite its focus on high-end experiences, the UX provides practical features like a trunk capacity of 283-367 L, catering to urban escapades or minimalist adventure trips.

The Mazda CX-30 expands on passenger accommodation with seating for five, making it ideal for families. The CX-30 also offers a larger trunk capacity of 422-430 L, granting extra space for luggage and equipment, which is advantageous for longer journeys.

UX @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation

Safety and Technological Innovations

Both models deploy state-of-the-art safety features, but each brand has distinct technological highlights. Lexus equips the UX with advanced driver assistance systems and connectivity features that align with their commitment to innovation and luxury.

Mazda integrates the CX-30 with intuitive systems that enhance the driving experience while ensuring safety. The integration of mild-hybrid technology in Mazda's engine further exemplifies its commitment to blending performance with ecological mindfulness.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion

The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 offer exciting alternatives for compact SUV buyers. The Lexus UX appeals to those prioritizing luxury and electrified innovation, while the Mazda CX-30 captures the essence of spirited driving with a larger cabin and sporty elegance. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on whether the buyer values a cutting-edge urban experience or the allure of a balanced, spirited drive.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

UX @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Lexus UX costs 37900 £. That’s a price difference of around 12694 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lexus UX manages with 5 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus UX has a barely noticeable edge – offering 199 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus UX is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Lexus UX tops out at 177 km/h. The difference is around 27 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1495 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly perceptible more room – 430 L compared to 320 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs to a small extent better – up to 1406 L, which is about 175 L more than the Lexus UX.

When it comes to payload, Lexus UX slightly takes the win – 615 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Lexus UX

The Lexus UX is a compact SUV that effortlessly blends sleek design with urban agility, making it a perfect choice for city driving. Its interior is thoughtfully crafted, offering both comfort and sophistication with high-quality materials and advanced technology features. This vehicle provides a smooth and refined driving experience, making it both a practical and stylish option for modern motorists.

details
78811-lexusux250h2023005 @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
78811-lexusux250h2023006 @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
78811-lexusux250h2023008 @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
76370-mc23-ux-reveal-018-high-jpg @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus UX
VS
If you're choosing between the new Lexus LBX and the older Lexus UX, the LBX is the cheeky city-smart compact — smaller, cheaper and lighter on fuel thanks to Toyota-derived hybrid underpinnings — while the UX delivers a chunkier, more premium feel, extra interior space and stronger hybrid …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
UX @ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
37900 - 54100 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 127 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1495 - 1555 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
283 - 320 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4495 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1840 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1194 - 1231 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
555 - 615 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
199 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
177 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
146 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1987 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus UX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus UX and Toyota Corolla Cross each offer unique appeals tailored to different buyers. The Lexus UX delivers a more luxurious experience with its upscale interior and advanced features, while the Toyota Corolla Cross stands out for its practicality and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus UX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinctive designs and hybrid options. While the Lexus UX offers a more premium interior and advanced technology features, the Toyota C-HR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its sporty styling and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
Is the Lexus UX offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.