VS

Lexus UX vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (199 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (38,700 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lexus UX or Mazda CX-30?

Lexus UX vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Lexus UX

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

UX

Overview: Lexus UX vs Mazda CX-30 — what this comparison is about

Lexus UX vs Mazda CX-30 pits a premium-minded urban hybrid against a driver-focused compact crossover, and the choice comes down to priorities rather than outright superiority. The Lexus UX leans into a calm, efficient city life with a luxury presentation and service-backed ownership. The Mazda CX-30 emphasizes tactile quality and engagement, rewarding those who value steering feel and a composed motorway demeanor. Read on to see how those personalities affect comfort, practicality and everyday usability.

CX-30

Character and driving experience

The Lexus UX presents itself as a placid, city‑tuned crossover: it prefers smooth progress, low fuel use in stop‑start traffic and a relaxed, upscale demeanor. The Mazda CX-30 answers with a firmer, more communicative setup that makes routine drives feel more involving, especially on bends and country roads. That means the Lexus forgives lazy inputs and masks minor road imperfections, while the Mazda rewards precision and will feel livelier for someone who enjoys steering feel. If you choose Lexus UX you buy serenity and predictability; if you choose Mazda CX-30 you buy engagement and driver feedback.

UX

Cabin feel and perceived quality

Both the Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 punch above their size when it comes to interior materials, but they aim for different atmospheres. Lexus UX delivers a softer, more composed cabin with premium touches and a deliberately tranquil presentation that reads as luxury from first touch. Mazda CX-30 counters with a minimalist, driver‑centric layout where materials and fit feel near‑premium and the controls (notably the rotary interface) keep attention on the road. In everyday use the Lexus feels like a small premium lounge, while the Mazda feels like a well‑made cockpit — both high quality, but each will appeal to different sensibilities.

CX-30

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On longer runs the Mazda CX-30 often surprises: low wind noise and strong motorway composure make it quietly confident at speed, though its suspension can be fidgety over town‑style potholes or sharp transverse joints. The Lexus UX is exceptionally calm in city and steady‑speed situations and isolates occupants nicely during gentle cruising, yet its hybrid drivetrain becomes more audible and strained when you push for brisk overtakes. That trade‑off means the Mazda is better for miles on the motorway with a driver who enjoys the road, while the Lexus is more forgiving for stop‑start commuting and relaxed cross‑city trips.

UX

Usability, practicality and family sense

Both cars limit rear accommodation compared with larger crossovers, but the compromises show in different ways: the Lexus UX feels tighter in the back and offers a smaller boot, making it less flexible for bulky weekend gear or growing families. The Mazda CX-30 provides a bit more usable luggage area and a practical layout, though a higher load lip and slightly conservative cargo geometry can complicate heavy lifting. In town the Lexus’s compact footprint and pampered ride make parking and daily errands easier, while the Mazda’s better load space and more engaging driving make it the more sensible pick for occasional longer trips with luggage. Families carrying child seats or regular cargo will notice these differences quickly in daily life.

CX-30

Buyer fit: who should pick which car

If your life is dominated by urban driving, you value a quiet, premium interior and want a relaxed ownership experience with strong brand service, the Lexus UX is tailored to that role. If you prize tactile steering, near‑premium cabin feel, quieter high‑speed manners and a more engaging driving experience — and you can live with slightly higher consumption and the space limits — the Mazda CX-30 is the more appealing choice. Both appeal to buyers who favour quality over outright space, but the decision narrows to whether you prioritize serene city efficiency (Lexus UX) or driver‑centric road manners and luggage practicality (Mazda CX-30). The technical comparison that follows will unpack how those practical consequences arise from drivetrain, dimensions and equipment choices.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
Lexus UX
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Lexus UX means deciding whether you prefer the LBX’s fresh, ultra-compact city focus or the UX’s established track record and slightly roomier cabin. I’ll compare size, efficiency, features and driving feel to help you pick the Lexus that best matches your …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

UX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Lexus UX costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,508 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lexus UX uses 5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus UX offers barely more power – delivering 199 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus UX is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

UX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,495 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly more boot space – 430 L compared to 320 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lexus UX carries a bit more – 615 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lexus UX

The Lexus UX is a compact luxury crossover that blends sharp styling with a quiet, comfortable cabin, perfect for urban buyers who want premium feel without shouting about it. It rides with poise, serves up plush materials and thoughtful tech, and—while it won’t satisfy anyone chasing track thrills—it's a smart, stylish choice for everyday driving.

details
78811-lexusux250h2023005
78811-lexusux250h2023006
78811-lexusux250h2023008
76370-mc23-ux-reveal-018-high-jpg

Reviews Lexus UX

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
marjollet
10 Feb 2026, 16:56:36

After a Toyota Avensis D4D with a BMW engine, I chose the UX 250h F Sport Design and I'm very satisfied.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Norma
21 Dec 2025, 18:27:57

Lv my UX I live 10 miles outside Belfast do aloy of country driving to reach different places I go t

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Kia Niro
Lexus UX
VS
The Kia Niro and the Lexus UX are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want efficient, city-friendly SUVs but with different priorities—value and practicality versus premium feel. The Niro focuses on practicality and a range of hybrid/electric options, while the UX emphasizes refined materials, …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,700 - 54,100 £
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 127 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,495 - 1,555 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
320 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 615 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
199 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
146 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,987 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Lexus
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Lexus UX have?

The Lexus UX is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.