VS

Lynk & Co 01 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (36900 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 01 or Mazda CX-6e?

Lynk & Co 01 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Lynk & Co 01

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • minimal more power
  • slight quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • to a small extent lighter

Mazda CX-6e

  • clearly more electric range
  • minimal more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

01

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Lynk & Co 01 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36900 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5996 £.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e performs clearly better – achieving up to 484 km, about 409 km more than the Lynk & Co 01.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 has a minimal edge – offering 280 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.70 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 01 pulls decisively stronger with 535 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 245 Nm difference.

01

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Lynk & Co 01 is to a small extent lighter – 1935 kg compared to 2205 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers minimal more room – 468 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.

When it comes to payload, Lynk & Co 01 barely noticeable takes the win – 415 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-6e is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Lynk & Co 01
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.9 - 19.4 kWh
  • Electric Range : 468 - 484 km

Lynk & Co 01

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Lynk & Co 01
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
36900 - 40300 £
Price
42800 - 45400 £
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh
Electric Range
75 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
20 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1935 kg
Curb weight
2205 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1860 mm
Width
1935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
415 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
280 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
535 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
206 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
1499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
Mazda
Is the Lynk & Co 01 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.