VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Mazda CX-6e?

Skoda Enyaq vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • hardly perceptible cheaper
  • clearly perceptible more power
  • distinct more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • convincingly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • minimal lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

Mazda CX-6e

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Enyaq has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-6e with 18.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 4.10 kWh.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – achieving up to 587 km, about 103 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm difference.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is minimal lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2205 kg. The difference is around 26 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more room – 585 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq clearly perceptible takes the win – 489 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 52200 £
Price
42800 - 45400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2205 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4658 mm
Length
-
Width
1879 mm
Width
1935 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Mazda
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.