Compare performance (116 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 43,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Nissan Primastar Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 2 Hybrid is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Transporter costs 43,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,246 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Nissan Primastar Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Primastar Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Primastar Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is substantially lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,926 kg. The difference is around 746 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Primastar Transporter carries clearly more – 1,110 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 675 kg.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
detailsThe Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 28,300 £
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|