Compare performance (116 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Renault Clio?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact cars, the rivalry between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Renault Clio is heating up. Both vehicles offer a blend of performance, efficiency, and innovative technology, making them compelling options for anyone considering a city-friendly hatchback. Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two contenders apart.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid stands as a full hybrid champion with a 1.5-liter 3-cylinder engine that produces a respectable 116 HP (85 kW) and 87 g/km of CO2 emissions. It features an automatic CVT transmission and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, reaching a top speed of 175 km/h. With a curb weight of 1,180 kg and a fuel consumption of just 3.8 L/100km, it ranks high in efficiency thanks to its clever hybrid setup.
On the other hand, the Renault Clio offers a broader engine range, with options including petroleum and LPG alongside its full hybrid variant. The hybrid option boasts 143 HP (105 kW), providing a little more horsepower than the Mazda. The Clio accelerates quicker, clocking in at 9.3 seconds from 0-100 km/h, and although its top speed of 174 km/h is slightly lower, it ensures a spirited driving experience. Nonetheless, its fuel consumption varies, with the hybrid model rated at a more conservative 4.3 L/100km.
When it comes to dimensions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, giving it a compact footprint that's perfect for urban navigation. The Clio is somewhat larger at 4053 mm long, 1798 mm wide, and 1440 mm high. This increase in size translates into a roomy trunk capacity of 301 liters for the Clio compared to Mazda's 286 liters, providing slightly better practicality for everyday needs.
In terms of technology, both vehicles come equipped with various modern features aimed at enhancing driver experience and safety. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is lauded for its intuitive infotainment system, which includes a digital display, superb connectivity features, and efficient energy management systems aimed at maximizing battery life.
The Renault Clio, meanwhile, benefits from an equally sophisticated suite of technological innovations, including advanced driver-assistance systems, touchscreen infotainment, and even AI-enhanced functionalities for optimizing fuel efficiency. The flexibility of engine choice also allows consumers to select a powertrain that best fits their lifestyle.
Both cars excel in terms of environmental responsibility. The Mazda 2 Hybrid achieves CO2 emissions as low as 87 g/km, placing it firmly in the B efficiency class, whereas the Renault Clio has emissions ranging from 97 g/km to 130 g/km, depending on the variant. This eco-friendly performance is complemented by their low fuel consumption figures, making both vehicles appealing choices for environmentally-conscious consumers.
In the Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Renault Clio showdown, the decision comes down to personal preference and priorities. If you prioritize a slightly lighter car with exceptional fuel efficiency and low emissions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid could be your best bet. However, if you wish for more power, room, and versatility in engine options, the Renault Clio emerges as a strong contender.
Ultimately, both models showcase significant innovations, efficiency, and vibrant driving dynamics, ensuring that it’s not just about one being better than the other, but rather which one suits your needs and driving style. Happy driving!
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mazda 2 Hybrid costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,220 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Renault Clio with 4.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.7 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is very slightly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers a bit more boot space – 327 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 41 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries only slightly more – 463 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
details
The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 28,300 £
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
92 - 118 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España