Mazda VS Renault

VS

In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out with its stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize both aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers practicality and a host of tech features, making it a smart choice for city dwellers seeking efficiency and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each brings unique strengths to the table.

Mazda

details

Renault

details

Understanding the Compact Hybrid Battle: Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Renault Clio

In the world of compact cars, the rivalry between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Renault Clio is heating up. Both vehicles offer a blend of performance, efficiency, and innovative technology, making them compelling options for anyone considering a city-friendly hatchback. Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two contenders apart.

Performance and Powertrains

The Mazda 2 Hybrid stands as a full hybrid champion with a 1.5-liter 3-cylinder engine that produces a respectable 116 HP (85 kW) and 87 g/km of CO2 emissions. It features an automatic CVT transmission and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, reaching a top speed of 175 km/h. With a curb weight of 1,180 kg and a fuel consumption of just 3.8 L/100km, it ranks high in efficiency thanks to its clever hybrid setup.

On the other hand, the Renault Clio offers a broader engine range, with options including petroleum and LPG alongside its full hybrid variant. The hybrid option boasts 143 HP (105 kW), providing a little more horsepower than the Mazda. The Clio accelerates quicker, clocking in at 9.3 seconds from 0-100 km/h, and although its top speed of 174 km/h is slightly lower, it ensures a spirited driving experience. Nonetheless, its fuel consumption varies, with the hybrid model rated at a more conservative 4.3 L/100km.

Dimensions and Practicality

When it comes to dimensions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, giving it a compact footprint that's perfect for urban navigation. The Clio is somewhat larger at 4053 mm long, 1798 mm wide, and 1440 mm high. This increase in size translates into a roomy trunk capacity of 301 liters for the Clio compared to Mazda's 286 liters, providing slightly better practicality for everyday needs.

Technology and Innovations

In terms of technology, both vehicles come equipped with various modern features aimed at enhancing driver experience and safety. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is lauded for its intuitive infotainment system, which includes a digital display, superb connectivity features, and efficient energy management systems aimed at maximizing battery life.

The Renault Clio, meanwhile, benefits from an equally sophisticated suite of technological innovations, including advanced driver-assistance systems, touchscreen infotainment, and even AI-enhanced functionalities for optimizing fuel efficiency. The flexibility of engine choice also allows consumers to select a powertrain that best fits their lifestyle.

Environmental Impact and Economy

Both cars excel in terms of environmental responsibility. The Mazda 2 Hybrid achieves CO2 emissions as low as 87 g/km, placing it firmly in the B efficiency class, whereas the Renault Clio has emissions ranging from 97 g/km to 130 g/km, depending on the variant. This eco-friendly performance is complemented by their low fuel consumption figures, making both vehicles appealing choices for environmentally-conscious consumers.

Conclusion: Which One Wins?

In the Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Renault Clio showdown, the decision comes down to personal preference and priorities. If you prioritize a slightly lighter car with exceptional fuel efficiency and low emissions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid could be your best bet. However, if you wish for more power, room, and versatility in engine options, the Renault Clio emerges as a strong contender.

Ultimately, both models showcase significant innovations, efficiency, and vibrant driving dynamics, ensuring that it’s not just about one being better than the other, but rather which one suits your needs and driving style. Happy driving!

Mazda
Renault

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 21400 - 28200 £
Price
about 15800 - 23000 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
87 - 93 g/km
co2
97 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
36 L
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1180 kg
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Trunk capacity
286 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
3940 mm
Length
4053 mm
Width
1745 mm
Width
1798 mm
Height
1505 mm
Height
1440 mm
Payload
435 kg
Payload
365 - 406 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, LPG
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 HP
Power HP
67 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1 s
Max Speed
175 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 174 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 kW
Power kW
49 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1490 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Top speed
175 km/h
Top speed
160 - 174 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.