In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out with its stylish design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize both aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers practicality and a host of tech features, making it a smart choice for city dwellers seeking efficiency and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each brings unique strengths to the table.
In the world of compact cars, the rivalry between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Renault Clio is heating up. Both vehicles offer a blend of performance, efficiency, and innovative technology, making them compelling options for anyone considering a city-friendly hatchback. Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two contenders apart.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid stands as a full hybrid champion with a 1.5-liter 3-cylinder engine that produces a respectable 116 HP (85 kW) and 87 g/km of CO2 emissions. It features an automatic CVT transmission and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, reaching a top speed of 175 km/h. With a curb weight of 1,180 kg and a fuel consumption of just 3.8 L/100km, it ranks high in efficiency thanks to its clever hybrid setup.
On the other hand, the Renault Clio offers a broader engine range, with options including petroleum and LPG alongside its full hybrid variant. The hybrid option boasts 143 HP (105 kW), providing a little more horsepower than the Mazda. The Clio accelerates quicker, clocking in at 9.3 seconds from 0-100 km/h, and although its top speed of 174 km/h is slightly lower, it ensures a spirited driving experience. Nonetheless, its fuel consumption varies, with the hybrid model rated at a more conservative 4.3 L/100km.
When it comes to dimensions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, giving it a compact footprint that's perfect for urban navigation. The Clio is somewhat larger at 4053 mm long, 1798 mm wide, and 1440 mm high. This increase in size translates into a roomy trunk capacity of 301 liters for the Clio compared to Mazda's 286 liters, providing slightly better practicality for everyday needs.
In terms of technology, both vehicles come equipped with various modern features aimed at enhancing driver experience and safety. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is lauded for its intuitive infotainment system, which includes a digital display, superb connectivity features, and efficient energy management systems aimed at maximizing battery life.
The Renault Clio, meanwhile, benefits from an equally sophisticated suite of technological innovations, including advanced driver-assistance systems, touchscreen infotainment, and even AI-enhanced functionalities for optimizing fuel efficiency. The flexibility of engine choice also allows consumers to select a powertrain that best fits their lifestyle.
Both cars excel in terms of environmental responsibility. The Mazda 2 Hybrid achieves CO2 emissions as low as 87 g/km, placing it firmly in the B efficiency class, whereas the Renault Clio has emissions ranging from 97 g/km to 130 g/km, depending on the variant. This eco-friendly performance is complemented by their low fuel consumption figures, making both vehicles appealing choices for environmentally-conscious consumers.
In the Mazda 2 Hybrid vs Renault Clio showdown, the decision comes down to personal preference and priorities. If you prioritize a slightly lighter car with exceptional fuel efficiency and low emissions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid could be your best bet. However, if you wish for more power, room, and versatility in engine options, the Renault Clio emerges as a strong contender.
Ultimately, both models showcase significant innovations, efficiency, and vibrant driving dynamics, ensuring that it’s not just about one being better than the other, but rather which one suits your needs and driving style. Happy driving!
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 21400 - 28200
£
|
Price
about 15800 - 23000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
87 - 93
g/km
|
co2
97 - 130
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 42
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1180
kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331
kg
|
Trunk capacity
286
L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391
L
|
Length
3940
mm
|
Length
4053
mm
|
Width
1745
mm
|
Width
1798
mm
|
Height
1505
mm
|
Height
1440
mm
|
Payload
435
kg
|
Payload
365 - 406
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, LPG
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116
HP
|
Power HP
67 - 143
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1
s
|
Max Speed
175
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
95 - 205
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85
kW
|
Power kW
49 - 105
kW
|
Engine capacity
1490
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
175
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.