Compare performance (116 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive market has seen a significant shift towards hybrid and efficient vehicles. Among the many choices available, the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Nissan Juke stand out for their innovative approaches to efficiency, comfort, and technology. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two popular models to help you decide which vehicle meets your needs best.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid, a hatchback, boasts a full hybrid engine that delivers a horsepower of 116 HP (85 kW). It features a continuous variable transmission (CVT) and is front-wheel drive. With a fuel consumption of just 3.8 to 4 L/100km, it's an eco-friendlier option, coupled with a CO2 emission level of 87-93 g/km. The vehicle accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 9.7 seconds, while the engine has a total capacity of 1490 cm³.
On the other hand, the Nissan Juke offers more variety with options in both petrol and full hybrid engines. Depending on the variant, the Juke's horsepower ranges from 114 HP (84 kW) to 143 HP (105 kW). It also features multiple transmission options including manual and dual-clutch automated systems, providing flexibility. Fuel consumption is slightly higher, ranging from 4.7 to 6 L/100km, with CO2 emissions spanning from 107 to 137 g/km. The Juke’s acceleration varies, with some models reaching 100 km/h in 10.1 to 11.8 seconds.
In terms of size, the Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length and has a width of 1745 mm and a height of 1505 mm. It offers seating for five and a trunk capacity of 286 liters, which should be adequate for day-to-day needs.
The Nissan Juke, being an SUV, is larger overall with a length of 4210 mm, a width of 1800 mm, and a height of 1593 mm. While it also seats five, its trunk capacity is more generous, ranging from 354 to 422 liters depending on the model, making it a better fit for those who prioritize storage and space.
While both vehicles prioritize an efficient driving experience, they approach it differently. The Mazda 2 Hybrid's full hybrid system ensures a seamless transition between electric and petrol power, optimizing fuel efficiency without compromising on performance. The CVT transmission contributes to a smoother acceleration experience, making city driving more effortless.
The Nissan Juke, meanwhile, incorporates modern technological features, such as advanced driver assistance systems and infotainment options that enhance the driving experience. Its available sport mode offers sharper handling and responsiveness, catering to those looking for a more dynamic drive. Furthermore, the Juke's hybrid variant includes a smaller battery capacity of 0.6 kWh that aids in energy recovery during braking.
Choosing between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Nissan Juke will ultimately depend on your personal preferences and requirements. If you value a compact, fuel-efficient hatchback with lower emissions, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is a compelling choice. Its eco-friendly credentials and lightweight design make it perfect for urban commuting.
Conversely, if you desire more space and a higher driving position, the Nissan Juke offers a broader range of capabilities, with more power options and enhanced technological features, making it a versatile choice for families or those who often travel with larger loads.
Both vehicles showcase impressive innovations and merit in their right, leaving prospective buyers with a delightful dilemma: efficiency and compactness or space and versatility. Happy driving!
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Juke is barely cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda 2 Hybrid costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers a bit more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 9.7 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is marginally lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 94 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers noticeably more boot space – 422 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 136 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 2 Hybrid carries only slightly more – 435 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.
The Nissan Juke is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,200 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España