Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Nissan Juke – Which car suits you better?
3 Hatchback
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Juke has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3163 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Juke manages with 4.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Juke
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs a bit better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Nissan Juke tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda 3 Hatchback pulls to a small extent stronger with 240 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
3 Hatchback
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is slightly lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Juke offers somewhat more room – 422 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Juke performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1305 L, which is about 279 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.
When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback somewhat takes the win – 485 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda 3 Hatchback proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Hatchback is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Nissan Juke
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,500
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Mazda 3 Hatchback
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Nissan Juke
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24500 - 35500 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4460 mm
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
1435 mm
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Hatchback have?
The Mazda 3 Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.