VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Skoda Fabia – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda 3 Hatchback or Skoda Fabia fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Fabia has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24500 £. That’s a price difference of around 7671 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

Fabia @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs slight better – reaching 222 km/h, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Fabia pulls slight stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

3 Hatchback @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is clearly perceptible lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 276 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers slight more room – 380 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Fabia performs somewhat better – up to 1190 L, which is about 164 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback minimal takes the win – 485 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Fabia proves to be edges out slightly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Fabia is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £16,900
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.3 L
details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a sleek and modern design, capturing attention with its streamlined curves and dynamic stance. Inside, the interior showcases high-quality materials and an intuitive layout, providing comfort and ease for both driver and passengers. On the road, this hatchback impresses with its agile handling and responsive performance, making it a practical yet stylish choice for urban and suburban driving.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia presents itself as a practical and stylish hatchback, perfect for urban driving and beyond. Its interior is designed with comfort and functionality in mind, offering ample space and intuitive controls. With a focus on efficiency, the Fabia provides a smooth driving experience, complemented by its crisp and modern exterior design.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the SEAT Ibiza showcases its sporty design and agile handling, making it a favorite for urban drivers seeking a bit of flair during their daily commute. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its practicality and generous interior space, offering a more family-friendly alternative without compromising on performance. Both vehicles share Volkswagen Group DNA, ensuring reliable engineering and a range of efficient engine options, but choosing between them ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride height, perfect for those seeking versatility in both city and country driving. Ultimately, the choice between these two Skoda vehicles boils down to personal preference, with each catering to distinct needs and lifestyles.
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Skoda Fabia
3 Hatchback
Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
24500 - 35500 £
Price
16900 - 26000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
112 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
Curb weight
1143 - 1261 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
4460 mm
Length
4108 - 4125 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1435 mm
Height
1459 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Payload
470 - 485 kg
Payload
414 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
80 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 222 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
59 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
In the compact car showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the VW Golf, both models offer impressive build quality typical of the Volkswagen Group. The Skoda Fabia shines with its exceptional value for money, providing ample space and practicality for urban driving. Meanwhile, the VW Golf maintains its iconic status with superior driving dynamics, a refined interior, and a range of advanced tech features, appealing to those who crave a more premium experience.
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot capacity, making it ideal for families and daily commuters. Ultimately, the choice between the Arona and Fabia will hinge on personal priorities, whether they lie in style and performance or practicality and functionality.
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Scala, buyers are treated to two distinct flavors of practicality and style. The Fabia excels as a compact hatchback with a nimble design and generous cargo space, making it ideal for city driving. Meanwhile, the Scala stands out with its more spacious interior and striking aesthetics, appealing to those who prioritize both roominess and modern flair in their daily commute.
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia stands out with its practicality and generous interior space, making it an attractive choice for drivers who demand reliability and functionality.
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the compact hatchback segment, the Hyundai i20 and Skoda Fabia offer distinct advantages for discerning buyers. The i20 impresses with its stylish design, advanced tech features, and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban commuters. Meanwhile, the Fabia excels with its refined driving dynamics and practicality, appealing to those who prioritize a robust build and storage versatility.
Dacia Sandero
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the budget-friendly compact car segment, the Dacia Sandero and Skoda Fabia offer two distinct approaches. The Sandero boasts exceptional value for money with its spacious interior and rugged build, making it an ideal choice for cost-conscious buyers. On the other hand, the Fabia impresses with its refined design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a balance between affordability and sophistication.
Honda Jazz
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
In the competitive realm of compact hatchbacks, the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback each bring unique merits to the table. The Honda Jazz impresses with its clever interior packaging and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice for urban dwellers. Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 Hatchback captivates with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance.
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
When comparing the Skoda Fabia and the Toyota Yaris Cross, each model caters to a distinct set of priorities for urban drivers. The Skoda Fabia impresses with its spacious interior and efficient fuel economy, making it a practical choice for those prioritizing affordability and everyday usability. On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a modern hybrid option and a more elevated driving position, appealing to those who emphasize innovative technology and a crossover's practicality.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Hatchback have?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.