@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (24500 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Volvo XC40?

Mazda 3 Hatchback

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Hatchback has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24500 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 12214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda 3 Hatchback manages with 5.60 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a slight edge – offering 197 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls a bit stronger with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is a bit lighter – 1419 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 269 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers clearly perceptible more room – 452 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1328 L, which is about 302 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 barely noticeable takes the win – 532 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda 3 Hatchback shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £24,500
3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.6 - 6.5 L
details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Mazda 3 Hatchback

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Volvo XC40
3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
24500 - 35500 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4460 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1435 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
470 - 485 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 both present compelling choices with their distinct offerings. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it an ideal choice for families who value comfort and utility. On the other hand, the XC40 …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Hatchback have?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.