Compare performance (186 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (24,500 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Volvo XC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The market for compact vehicles is rich with choices, and two popular contenders vying for attention are the Mazda 3 Hatchback and the Volvo XC40. These vehicles cater to the needs of urban drivers seeking efficiency, style, and cutting-edge technology. But how do they compare in terms of performance and innovation?
The 2024 Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a variety of performance options. With choices between a manual or automatic gearbox, it gives drivers flexibility. Its engine lineup includes petrol MHEV with outputs ranging from 140 to 186 horsepower. The hatchback accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a respectable 8-9.8 seconds with a top speed reaching between 199 to 216 km/h. This performance is backed by torque ratings of 238-240 Nm, all while maintaining efficient fuel consumption between 5.6 and 6.5 L/100 km.
In contrast, the Volvo XC40 focuses on delivering a premium yet efficient drive with its dual-clutch automatic transmission. This SUV features engines that produce between 163 and 197 horsepower, along with a torque ranging from 265 to 300 Nm. The XC40 sprints from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.6 to 8.6 seconds and reaches a maximum speed of 180 km/h, ensuring a smooth and powerful urban drive.
Both the Mazda 3 Hatchback and the Volvo XC40 boast ergonomic interiors designed for five passengers. The Mazda offers a trunk capacity of 351 liters and strikes a balance between style and functionality with its modern design. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 stands out with a more spacious trunk at 452 liters, ensuring enough room for cargo, which is ideal for small families or those with an active lifestyle.
Measuring at a length of 4460 mm, a width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1435 mm, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a sleek and compact design, allowing for easy navigation through tight urban spaces. Its lightweight design promises a curb weight between 1419 and 1549 kg.
The Volvo XC40, categorized as an SUV, offers a more robust presence with dimensions of 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1652 mm in height. This larger frame is reflected in its higher curb weight of 1688 kg, a tribute to its sturdy and safe build that is synonymous with the Volvo brand.
While both models offer petrol MHEV options, the Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a better CO2 efficiency class at D and E, with CO2 emissions ranging from 126 to 146 g/km. Conversely, the Volvo XC40 has a CO2 efficiency class of E, with slightly higher emissions at 147-148 g/km. Efficiency remains a top priority for both manufacturers as they aim to reduce environmental impact while delivering top-notch performance.
The decision between the Mazda 3 Hatchback and the Volvo XC40 ultimately hinges on individual preferences and priorities. For those seeking a nimble, efficient, and stylish vehicle perfect for city drives, the Mazda 3 Hatchback stands as a strong contender. However, if spaciousness, premium features, and a commanding presence are at the top of the checklist, the Volvo XC40 may be the perfect match.
Both vehicles showcase the latest in automotive innovations, demonstrating how modern engineering meets consumer demand in the ever-evolving landscape of compact vehicles.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,500 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,214 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers marginally more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC40 delivers slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is somewhat lighter – 1,419 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 269 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers clearly more boot space – 452 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries only slightly more – 532 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
|
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
|
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España