VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Mercedes EQA comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (25,400 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Mercedes EQA?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,426 £.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers moderately more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers visibly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 698 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers noticeably more boot space – 450 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries somewhat more – 501 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 228 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLC
VS
Mercedes EQA and Mercedes GLC go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQA or the …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
serpimg_ikGkXb

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Nöthi
27 Jul 2026, 18:41:16

Fantastic build quality and genuine premium-class feel with lots of features like distance sensors or the speed-limit sign reader — things Mercedes still brags about in the GLC even five years later...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the showdown between the Ford Explorer EV and the Mercedes EQA, both models showcase impressive electric capabilities while catering to distinct markets. The Explorer EV offers a spacious, family-friendly design with advanced technology features, making it a strong contender for those seeking …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.5
VS
In the growing segment of electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQA stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort and prestige. Meanwhile, the VW ID.5 offers a more sporty design and more spacious cargo capacity, appealing to those seeking …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX30
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX30 represent two compelling options for environmentally conscious drivers. The EQA combines luxury with innovative technology, offering a comfortable ride and impressive performance that can cater to discerning tastes. …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Mercedes EQA and Skoda Enyaq, luxury meets practicality in an electrifying competition. The EQA impresses with its premium materials and advanced technology, catering to those who crave a refined driving experience, while the Enyaq stands out for its spacious …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
Comparing the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA brings together two compact electric SUVs with different personalities: the iX2 favours sporty handling and driver engagement, while the EQA prioritises comfort and a polished Mercedes interior. Which suits you will come down to priorities like range, cabin …
Mazda 2
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
Choosing between the city‑savvy Mazda2 and the more grown-up Mazda3 Sedan comes down to whether you prioritize low running costs and easy urban manoeuvrability or a roomier cabin, stronger performance and extra tech. I’ll compare the key points — size, engines, economy, equipment and driving feel — …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,400 - 34,700 £
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,468 kg
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
482 - 501 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
228 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
168 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.