VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs SEAT Arona – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or SEAT Arona?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SEAT Arona has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19300 £, while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5675 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Arona manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a a bit edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Sedan performs minimal better – reaching 216 km/h, while the SEAT Arona tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Arona pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, the SEAT Arona is a bit lighter – 1188 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 232 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers a bit more room – 450 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, SEAT Arona hardly perceptible takes the win – 522 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Our conclusion: The Mazda 3 Sedan proves to be leads convincingly overall and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Mazda 3 Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Similar Comparisons

SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the burgeoning segment of compact SUVs, the SEAT Arona and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their unique designs and driving dynamics. While the Arona offers a sportier aesthetic and a slightly more engaging drive, the Kamiq emphasizes comfort and practicality, making it an excellent choice for families. Both models are equipped with a range of tech features, ensuring they are well-suited to modern driving demands.
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
In the showdown between the SEAT Arona and SEAT Ibiza, buyers must weigh their preferences for versatility versus agility. The Arona, with its compact SUV stance, offers a higher driving position and greater cargo space, making it ideal for those who need practicality without sacrificing style. Conversely, the Ibiza stands out for its sporty handling and nimble performance, appealing to drivers who prioritize a fun and dynamic driving experience.

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a stylish compact SUV that blends urban agility with a robust design, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers and adventure seekers alike. Inside, it offers a well-crafted interior with modern technology and connectivity features that enhance the driving experience. With its efficient engine options and responsive handling, the Arona provides a dynamic ride while maintaining impressive fuel efficiency.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.de
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.de
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.de
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.de
Mazda 3 Sedan
SEAT Arona
Arona

Costs and Consumption
Price
25000 - 34200 £
Price
19300 - 29300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
122 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
Curb weight
1188 - 1268 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4153 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1537 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1280 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
502 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
203 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

Honda Jazz
SEAT Arona
VS
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality and a more conservative design that caters to family-oriented buyers. Both models deliver a well-rounded driving experience, but their unique features and branding make them stand out in their own right.
Hyundai Kona
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and SEAT Arona offer distinct appeal for urban drivers. The Kona stands out with its bold styling, advanced tech features, and a variety of powertrains, while the Arona impresses with its dynamic handling and customizable design options. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to personal preference, as each delivers a compelling blend of practicality and flair.
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Vauxhall Mokka
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive segment of subcompact SUVs, the Opel Mokka stands out with its striking design and tech-savvy interior, offering a premium feel that appeals to modern drivers. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona impresses with its sporty performance and practicality, making it a top choice for those who value a fun driving experience. Ultimately, both models present compelling options; it comes down to personal preference in style and driving dynamics.
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Audi Q2
SEAT Arona
VS
MG ZS
SEAT Arona
VS
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.