VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Fiat Panda comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 70 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 14,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Fiat Panda?

Mazda CX-30 vs Fiat Panda: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Panda is substantially cheaper – starting at 14,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,571 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Panda uses 5 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Panda

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Fiat Panda takes 13.9 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers clearly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 148 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Panda is noticeably lighter – 1,055 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 400 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers significantly more boot space – 430 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries clearly more – 496 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Panda
Fiat Pandina
VS
Comparing the Fiat Panda and the Pandina helps you decide whether you want a practical, feature-rich city car or a pared-back, economical runabout. The Panda offers more space, comfort and equipment for everyday use, while the Pandina prioritises low running costs, simplicity and compact charm.
Fiat 500
Fiat Panda
VS
The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro-styled city charmer that wraps bright personality and nimble handling into a compact package ideal for urban life. By contrast, the Fiat Panda trades glamour for practicality — roomier, tougher on rough roads and far more usable for families or weekend escapes, so …
Mazda CX-30
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Fiat Panda

The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.

details
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_333
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_157
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_304
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_049

Reviews Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
In a competitive showdown between the Mazda CX-30 and the VW Golf, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and characteristics. The CX-30 impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and practicality, while the Golf offers a well-rounded …
Fiat Panda
Kia Picanto
VS
The Fiat Panda and Kia Picanto are two of Europe’s most sensible city cars, offering affordable running costs and easy maneuverability for urban life. The Panda emphasizes practicality and interior space with a rugged, no-nonsense character, while the Picanto delivers sharper handling, more modern …
Fiat Panda
Peugeot 208
VS
The Fiat Panda and Peugeot 208 are two popular small hatchbacks that approach city driving very differently: the Panda emphasizes practicality, simplicity and surprising interior space, while the 208 prioritises style, refinement and modern tech. Choose the Panda for low running costs, rugged …
Dacia Sandero
Fiat Panda
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Dacia Sandero and the Fiat Panda, both models present themselves as budget-friendly urban warriors, each with its unique strengths. The Dacia Sandero impresses with its spacious interior and robust feature set, arguably offering more value for money in terms …
Fiat Panda
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Fiat Panda and Toyota Aygo are both popular city cars but take different approaches—Panda prioritises practicality, interior space and versatility, while the Aygo focuses on compact size, efficiency and easy urban manoeuvrability. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the …
Mazda CX-30
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
14,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
113 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
38 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,055 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
225 L
Length
-
Length
3,635 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,643 mm
Height
-
Height
1,551 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
365 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
70 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
164 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
92 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
51 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Fiat
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.