What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

How fast can the Mazda CX-30 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 204 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-30?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 is 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the VW Polo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo reaches a peak output of 207 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the VW Polo use?

On average, the VW Polo consumes 5.10 L.

What are the dimensions of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo measures 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide and 1451 mm high.

Mazda CX-30 vs VW Polo – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW Polo has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 8233 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Polo manages with 5.10 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a slightly edge – offering 207 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs a bit better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Polo is clearly perceptible lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 312 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more room – 430 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – up to 1406 L, which is about 281 L more than the VW Polo.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW Polo proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Polo is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews VW Polo

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

VS

The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Yaris

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Polo

VS

In the compact car showdown, the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo both make compelling cases, each boasting its own unique strengths. The Yaris shines with its impressive fuel efficiency and dependable reliability, making it a practical choice for everyday driving. On the other hand, the Polo …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 17000 - 30400 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 48 - 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1378 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 351 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4074 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1751 mm
Height 1540 mm	Height 1431 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity 1398 - 1406 L	Max trunk capacity 1125 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload 432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed 191 - 204 km/h	Max Speed 171 - 240 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3