VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Jeep Compass comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Jeep Compass?

Mazda CX-5 vs Jeep Compass: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is moderately cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.

Compass

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is barely faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers markedly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is marginally lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers only slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 33 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 458 L more than the Jeep Compass.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Compass holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Compass

Jeep Compass

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 95 - 500 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012

Reviews Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
When comparing the Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass, the Avenger stands out with its more compact design, making it ideal for city driving while still offering solid off-road capabilities. In contrast, the Compass delivers a more spacious interior and a smoother ride, appealing to families and …
Mazda CX-5
Peugeot 3008
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sporty performance and premium interior, making it a strong contender against the stylish Peugeot 3008. While the CX-5 offers a dynamic driving experience and impressive handling, the Peugeot 3008 captivates with its sleek …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the showdown between the Honda HR-V and the Mazda CX-5, the HR-V impresses with its spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers and small families. Meanwhile, the CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and robust performance, offering a more …
Mazda CX-5
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
550 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,552 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,675 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Jeep
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.