VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Jeep Compass comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Jeep Compass?

Mazda CX-5 vs Jeep Compass: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is moderately cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.

Compass

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers markedly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is marginally lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers slightly more boot space – 550 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries visibly more – 601 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 128 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Compass holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Compass

Jeep Compass

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 95 - 500 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012

Reviews Jeep Compass

2.4 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Jeep Compass
Opel Grandland
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Jeep Compass and the Vauxhall Grandland cater to those seeking compact SUVs, each with its own strengths. The Compass shines with its rugged off-road capability and distinctive styling, appealing to those with a spirit of adventure. Meanwhile, the Grandland stands …
Audi Q5
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q5 or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Jeep Compass
Volvo XC40
VS
The Jeep Compass and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-5
Jeep Compass

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
550 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
472 - 473 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Jeep
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.