VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Land Rover Range Rover?

Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 95,237 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 409 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 562 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is clearly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 875 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more boot space – 818 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 352 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries noticeably more – 846 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 245 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 115 - 116 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Land Rover Range Rover
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Range Rover with the Mercedes‑GLC (the electrified Mercedes‑EQ version) puts two different luxury philosophies head to head: the Range Rover offers commanding presence, traditional opulence and genuine off‑road ability, while the GLC EQ focuses on compact premium comfort, cutting‑edge …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_8864
Range_Rover_Batumi_Gold_D350_First_Edition_7354
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_7927
Range_Rover_Interiors_8452

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:08:33

Aesthetic presence but in today's world only a good hybrid or full electric should be offer..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda 6 Estate or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
62 - 267 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
645 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.