Compare performance (141 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Lynk & Co 02?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the dynamic world of SUVs, two formidable contenders stand out: the Mazda CX-5 and the Lynk & Co 02. Both bring unique strengths to the table, promising a rich mix of performance, style, and innovation. But how do they stack up against one another? Let’s delve into the technical aspects and innovative features of these two SUVs.
The Mazda CX-5 offers versatility with its range of engine options. Buyers can choose between a petrol mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and diesel engines. The CX-5 features power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP, backed by transmissions available in both manual and automatic configurations. The front-wheel and all-wheel drive options allow drivers tailored control to suit their driving preferences. With its maximum speed reaching up to 208 km/h, the CX-5 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 9.2 seconds.
On the other side, the Lynk & Co 02 opts for an all-electric powertrain, promising eco-friendly driving with zero emissions. With a robust power output of 272 HP and a significant torque of 343 Nm, its performance is nothing short of vivid. The 02 achieves a swift acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds, all while maintaining an efficient electric consumption between 17.1 and 17.6 kWh/100km. It also boasts a commendable electric range of up to 445 km.
Size-wise, both SUVs offer ample interior space within their compact frames. The Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, affording passengers a comfortable travel experience. The Lynk & Co 02, slightly more compact, measures 4460 mm in length, matching the CX-5 in width, but is considerably lower with a height of 1573 mm, giving it a sleeker silhouette.
The Mazda CX-5 showcases a generous trunk capacity of up to 522 liters, while the Lynk & Co 02 offers 440 liters, accentuating the CX-5's advantage in cargo space for long journeys or family adventures.
The Lynk & Co 02 excels in eco-friendliness, with a CO2 efficiency class of A and zero tailpipe emissions, aligning with the global push towards sustainable mobility. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5, though not as green as its electric counterpart, offers diverse fuel-efficient options. With CO2 emissions ranging from 146 to 173 g/km, it stands as a viable choice for those not yet ready to transition to electric.
Both SUVs provide seating for five, focusing on comfort and space. Mazda emphasizes practicality with its high payload capacity of up to 508 kg, while Lynk & Co offers a payload of 450 kg. Advanced infotainment systems and connectivity features are present in both models, providing tech-savvy amenities to enhance the driving experience.
The decision between the Mazda CX-5 and the Lynk & Co 02 depends heavily on personal priorities. The CX-5 appeals to those who seek varied engine and drivetrain options, with ample cargo space and a conventional SUV experience. Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 02 stands out for eco-conscious drivers looking for cutting-edge electric technology and impressive performance. Both models reflect their brands' commitment to delivering quality and innovation, ensuring there’s something for every SUV enthusiast.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-5 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 861 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 offers considerably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 02 delivers markedly more torque with 323 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is slightly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more boot space – 466 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 226 kg.
The Lynk & Co 02 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.
details
The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 169 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
Curb weight
1,895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
566 - 601 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España