Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-5 meets Lynk & Co 02.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the dynamic world of SUVs, two formidable contenders stand out: the Mazda CX-5 and the Lynk & Co 02. Both bring unique strengths to the table, promising a rich mix of performance, style, and innovation. But how do they stack up against one another? Let’s delve into the technical aspects and innovative features of these two SUVs.
The Mazda CX-5 offers versatility with its range of engine options. Buyers can choose between a petrol mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and diesel engines. The CX-5 features power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP, backed by transmissions available in both manual and automatic configurations. The front-wheel and all-wheel drive options allow drivers tailored control to suit their driving preferences. With its maximum speed reaching up to 208 km/h, the CX-5 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 9.2 seconds.
On the other side, the Lynk & Co 02 opts for an all-electric powertrain, promising eco-friendly driving with zero emissions. With a robust power output of 272 HP and a significant torque of 343 Nm, its performance is nothing short of vivid. The 02 achieves a swift acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds, all while maintaining an efficient electric consumption between 17.1 and 17.6 kWh/100km. It also boasts a commendable electric range of up to 445 km.
Size-wise, both SUVs offer ample interior space within their compact frames. The Mazda CX-5 measures 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, affording passengers a comfortable travel experience. The Lynk & Co 02, slightly more compact, measures 4460 mm in length, matching the CX-5 in width, but is considerably lower with a height of 1573 mm, giving it a sleeker silhouette.
The Mazda CX-5 showcases a generous trunk capacity of up to 522 liters, while the Lynk & Co 02 offers 440 liters, accentuating the CX-5's advantage in cargo space for long journeys or family adventures.
The Lynk & Co 02 excels in eco-friendliness, with a CO2 efficiency class of A and zero tailpipe emissions, aligning with the global push towards sustainable mobility. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5, though not as green as its electric counterpart, offers diverse fuel-efficient options. With CO2 emissions ranging from 146 to 173 g/km, it stands as a viable choice for those not yet ready to transition to electric.
Both SUVs provide seating for five, focusing on comfort and space. Mazda emphasizes practicality with its high payload capacity of up to 508 kg, while Lynk & Co offers a payload of 450 kg. Advanced infotainment systems and connectivity features are present in both models, providing tech-savvy amenities to enhance the driving experience.
The decision between the Mazda CX-5 and the Lynk & Co 02 depends heavily on personal priorities. The CX-5 appeals to those who seek varied engine and drivetrain options, with ample cargo space and a conventional SUV experience. Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 02 stands out for eco-conscious drivers looking for cutting-edge electric technology and impressive performance. Both models reflect their brands' commitment to delivering quality and innovation, ensuring there’s something for every SUV enthusiast.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-5 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30900 £. That’s a price difference of around 852 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a clearly edge – offering 272 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 5 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Lynk & Co 02 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls distinct stronger with 323 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers evident more room – 583 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs noticeable better – up to 2019 L, which is about 670 L more than the Lynk & Co 02.
Overall, the Lynk & Co 02 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The car 02 has captured the hearts of enthusiasts with its iconic design and engaging driving dynamics. Known for its lightweight build, it delivers a spirited performance that makes every twist and turn exhilarating. With its classic styling and a cabin that balances retro charm with modern comfort, the car 02 remains a true icon in the automotive world.
details|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30000 £
|
Price
30900 - 34300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 kg
|
Curb weight
1895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
583 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4690 mm
|
Length
4460 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.50 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España