VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Mercedes EQT comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Mercedes EQT?

Mazda CX-5 vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes EQT is very slightly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,217 £.

EQT

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers a bit more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQT delivers marginally more torque with 245 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is moderately lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 296 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQT comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,800
EQT

Mercedes EQT

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 265 - 278 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details
23C0128_203_1
23C0128_111_1
23C0128_107_1
23C0128_006_0
23C0128_212_1

Reviews Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda 6 Estate or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q5
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q5 or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Length
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
457 - 531 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.