VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Omoda 5?

Mazda CX-5 vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Omoda 5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,220 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 5 uses 5.3 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers visibly more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers markedly more torque with 340 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is marginally lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 8 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly more boot space – 466 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 116 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 536 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
Mazda CX-5
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Omoda
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.