What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Kamiq deliver on the road?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kamiq according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.30 L.

What maximum speed does the Skoda Kamiq reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 216 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq?

Length 4241 mm, width 1793 mm, height 1562 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq.

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Kamiq – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kamiq has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30000 £. That’s a price difference of around 8289 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 150 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is clearly perceptible lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 398 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers evident more room – 583 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 183 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs evident better – up to 2019 L, which is about 624 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details