VS

Mazda CX-5 vs NIO EL7 comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 63,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or NIO EL7?

Mazda CX-5 vs NIO EL7: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

NIO EL7

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the NIO EL7 costs 63,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,351 £.

EL7

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL7 offers clearly more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 512 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL7 delivers significantly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 612 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is clearly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,421 kg. The difference is around 792 kg.

Looking at boot space, the NIO EL7 offers a bit more boot space – 570 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries clearly more – 601 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 132 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The NIO EL7 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £63,300
EL7

NIO EL7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 653 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 22.1 - 22.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 384 - 501 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
NIO EL7

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

NIO EL7

The NIO EL7 arrives as a roomy electric SUV that pairs restrained elegance with bold design cues, and its interior feels like a calm, tech-forward lounge rather than a gadget parade. For buyers who crave effortless cruising, spirited performance and a tastefully premium experience — with just the right amount of showmanship for the driveway — the EL7 is an enticing, slightly theatrical choice.

details
el7_side_desktop
el7_backside_desktop

Reviews NIO EL7

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
BMW X1
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the ever-popular compact SUV segment, the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 offer distinct appeals to discerning buyers. The BMW X1 impresses with its refined interior, sporty driving dynamics, and tech-savvy features, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a luxurious yet agile ride. On the other …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-5 comes down to whether you prioritize roomy practicality and efficiency or sharper driving dynamics and a more premium cabin. The ZR-V leans toward user-friendly space, good fuel economy and value, while the CX-5 delivers engaging handling, stronger …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its blend of sporty handling and upscale interior, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts who don't want to compromise on comfort. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 stands out with a suite of advanced safety features and a luxurious Scandinavian …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the crowded SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai vie for attention with their distinct offering to drivers. The Mazda CX-5 stands out with its refined handling and upscale interior, delivering a premium feel that rivals more expensive models. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai impresses with …
Mazda CX-5
NIO EL7

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
63,300 - 81,300 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.1 - 22.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
384 - 501 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,421 - 2,441 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
4,912 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,987 mm
Height
-
Height
1,720 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,545 L
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
449 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
653 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
850 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
480 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
NIO
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.