VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Primastar Bus comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Primastar Bus?

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Primastar Bus: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Nissan Primastar Bus

  • a bit more power
  • very slightly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Bus costs 45,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,338 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Primastar Bus uses 6.9 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Primastar Bus

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Primastar Bus offers a bit more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Primastar Bus delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Primastar Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is markedly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,043 kg. The difference is around 414 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Primastar Bus carries substantially more – 1,002 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 401 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Primastar Bus holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,300
Primastar Bus

Nissan Primastar Bus

  • Engine Type Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Primastar Bus

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Primastar Bus

The Nissan Primastar is a sensible people-mover that puts practicality and flexible seating ahead of flash, making it the go-to for tradespeople, shuttle duties or large families who need space without fuss. It’s unpretentious on the road and easy to live with — not the car to win style points, but the one that earns them every time you need to load up and go.

details
serpimg_QqZ7qg

Reviews Nissan Primastar Bus

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
BMW X1
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the ever-popular compact SUV segment, the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 offer distinct appeals to discerning buyers. The BMW X1 impresses with its refined interior, sporty driving dynamics, and tech-savvy features, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a luxurious yet agile ride. On the other …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-5 comes down to whether you prioritize roomy practicality and efficiency or sharper driving dynamics and a more premium cabin. The ZR-V leans toward user-friendly space, good fuel economy and value, while the CX-5 delivers engaging handling, stronger …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its blend of sporty handling and upscale interior, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts who don't want to compromise on comfort. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 stands out with a suite of advanced safety features and a luxurious Scandinavian …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 are sibling compact SUVs that share Mazda’s upscale design and engaging driving feel, but they serve different needs: the CX-30 is a nimble, city-friendly crossover with tighter dimensions and slightly sportier handling, while the CX-5 offers more passenger and cargo …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan Primastar Bus

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
45,300 - 50,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
181 - 182 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
5
Seats
9
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,043 - 2,117 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
953 - 1,002 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.