VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mazda CX-5?

Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-30

Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda CX-5: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive landscape is continually evolving, offering consumers a plethora of choices. In the compact SUV segment, Mazda has made a name for itself with two standout models: the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda CX-5. Both vehicles offer compelling features, but they cater to slightly different audiences and driving needs. This comparison will dive into their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall performance to help potential buyers determine which model suits them best.

CX-5

Technical Specifications Overview

Both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 exhibit impressive craftsmanship, but they possess distinct characteristics defined by their dimensions, performance specs, and capabilities.

The Mazda CX-30 is smaller and sportier, boasting a length of 4395 mm, a width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1540 mm. It comes with a petrol MHEV engine, generating power outputs of 140 HP and 186 HP. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from 8.3 seconds to 10.3 seconds, all while managing a fuel consumption of 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. Moreover, it offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, making it versatile for varying terrains.

By contrast, the Mazda CX-5 is larger, with dimensions of 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height. The CX-5 is available with both petrol and diesel engine options, providing a broader range of power outputs that go up to 194 HP. The acceleration here is relatively moderate compared to the CX-30, with a range of 9.2 to 11.1 seconds. Fuel consumption for the CX-5 ranges from 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, which is also competitive in its class.

CX-30

Performance and Handling

When it comes to performance and handling, both vehicles benefit from Mazda’s renowned engineering. The CX-30’s sportier design and lighter curb weight (starting at 1485 kg) enable a nimble driving experience, particularly appealing to those who prefer a more engaging ride. The maximum speed for the CX-30 reaches up to 204 km/h, offering a spirited performance sans the heft of larger SUVs.

The CX-5’s larger dimensions translate to a stable on-road presence but can sometimes feel less agile. It weighs between 1567 kg and 1800 kg depending on the variant, which may affect the sportiness compared to the CX-30. However, its all-wheel-drive option and advanced G-Vectoring Control technology provide impressive handling and cornering stability, making it a capable companion for mixed driving scenarios.

CX-5

Interior Space and Comfort

Interior design is one of Mazda's most celebrated traits, and both the CX-30 and CX-5 deliver a pleasant atmosphere. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 430 L, sufficient for everyday needs, while the CX-5's trunk expands more significantly, offering 510 to 522 L depending on the variant. The interior setup in both models allows for comfortable seating for five passengers, featuring high-quality materials and ergonomic layouts.

The CX-5 leans towards a more spacious feel overall, making it an attractive option for families and road trips. However, the CX-30 impresses with its driver-oriented cockpit and refined aesthetics, catering to those who prioritize a sleek, modern look.

CX-30

Innovative Features

When discussing innovation, Mazda doesn't hold back in either model. The CX-30 is equipped with the latest infotainment features, including an intuitive Mazda Connect system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones. Notably, it comes with advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and a rear cross-traffic alert.

The CX-5, while slightly older in its design, also boasts a suite of safety technologies, alongside a more powerful audio system and additional driver convenience features, making it a strong contender for tech enthusiasts.

CX-5

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 ultimately comes down to individual preference and lifestyle needs. The CX-30 caters to those seeking a compact, sporty SUV with excellent fuel efficiency and a thrilling driving experience. Conversely, the CX-5 is perfect for families or individuals needing more space and versatility without sacrificing performance.

Both models emphasize Mazda’s commitment to quality, performance, and innovation, ensuring that whichever choice you make, you are in good hands.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is slightly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers barely more torque with 240 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 2 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is moderately lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers marginally more boot space – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries a bit more – 601 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.