VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mazda CX-5?

Mazda CX-30 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
CX-30

The real-world choice between two Mazdas

The Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 answer the same brief in very different ways, and that’s the heart of this Mazda CX-30 VS Mazda CX-5 matchup. The CX-30 feels like the driver’s pick with a more intimate footprint and a cabin that punches above its class, while the CX-5 leans into space, ease, and family-friendly versatility. On the road and in the boot, their characters diverge in ways you feel every day, not just on a spec sheet. Read on if you’re deciding between tidy agility and big-boot practicality wrapped in the same Mazda design ethos.

CX-5

Driving character and pace

The Mazda CX-30 is lighter on its feet and responds more keenly to steering inputs, giving everyday commutes a hint of weekend-drive enjoyment. It also gathers speed more readily, so overtakes take less planning and motorway slip roads feel easier. The Mazda CX-5 has a calmer, comfort-first gait and a powertrain that prioritizes smoothness over urgency, which suits relaxed drivers but won’t thrill the enthusiast. If you want crisp driving dynamics and a car that feels smaller than it looks, the CX-30 is the fit; if you value a laid-back, predictable cruise, the CX-5 delivers that in spades.

CX-30

Cabin feel and controls

The Mazda CX-30’s cockpit feels near-premium, with tactile materials and an ergonomically simple rotary interface that keeps eyes on the road; the standard head-up display reinforces that low-distraction vibe. The Mazda CX-5 counters with a bigger, tech-forward screen running Google services, but climate controls live in the touchscreen and there are fewer physical shortcuts. That makes the CX-5 more modern in features yet occasionally more fiddly, while the CX-30 is calmer to operate even if its voice assistant is nothing to brag about. If you prioritize touch-and-feel and straightforward infotainment logic, the CX-30’s approach is more satisfying; if deep app integration matters most, the CX-5 has the edge.

CX-5

Space and everyday practicality

The Mazda CX-5 simply gives you more: a roomier back seat with easier child-seat access and a cargo area that’s wide, flat, and friendly to bulky stuff. Its 40:20:40 rear-seat split and low loading floor make school runs and ski trips simpler. The Mazda CX-30 feels tighter in the second row and its high load lip can turn weekly shopping into a small workout, though it works fine for couples or a young family with modest gear. If you’re regularly juggling passengers, strollers, or sports kit, the CX-5 wins on practicality; the CX-30 trades some space for a sleeker, more intimate feel.

CX-30

Comfort, noise and long-distance manners

On the motorway, the Mazda CX-30 is impressively hushed for its size, with low wind noise and a planted attitude that makes long hauls feel easy; it can thump over sharp city imperfections, especially on larger wheels. The Mazda CX-5 rides softer day to day and takes the edge off rougher streets, though it can roll a bit more in fast bends and lets in more tire and engine noise when worked hard. For frequent highway miles at a steady clip, both settle in well but the CX-30 sounds more serene; for mixed-speed comfort with passengers, the CX-5’s cushioning pays off. Efficiency also tilts slightly toward the CX-30 in typical use, trimming ongoing running costs without reaching hybrid-level thrift.

CX-5

City life, costs and buyer fit

The Mazda CX-30’s smaller footprint makes it easier to thread through tight streets and snag narrow parking spots, though thick rear pillars mean you’ll lean on cameras and sensors; the ride can feel firm over urban scars. The Mazda CX-5 is larger but friendly to maneuver thanks to light steering and available 360-degree cameras, and its taller doors make hop-in, hop-out errands simpler. The CX-30 usually starts at a lower price and feels richer inside, while the CX-5 counters with greater family ease and a confidence-boosting warranty. In short, pick the CX-30 if you want a compact, premium-tinged companion for engaging city driving and quiet motorway stints; lean toward the CX-5 if daily life revolves around passengers, cargo, and stress-free usability—then dive into the technical comparison to see how those priorities play out in detail.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is slightly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers barely more torque with 240 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 2 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is moderately lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers marginally more boot space – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries a bit more – 601 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
Jeroen
4 Sept 2026, 11:40:07

G engine based on much tried and tested predecessor

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz present two compelling yet distinct choices for crossover enthusiasts. The CX-30 shines with its refined interior, agile handling, and a traditional gasoline powertrain that appeals to purists. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz, as an …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.