VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Vauxhall Astra comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 196 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 28,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Vauxhall Astra?

Mazda CX-5 vs Vauxhall Astra: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more trunk space
details

Vauxhall Astra

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Vauxhall Astra is only slightly cheaper – starting at 28,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,714 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Astra uses 2.2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.8 L/100km.

Astra

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Astra offers noticeably more power – delivering 196 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Astra is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Astra delivers noticeably more torque with 360 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 122 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Astra is a bit lighter – 1,438 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries a bit more – 601 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Astra stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,300
Astra

Vauxhall Astra

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 - 196 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.2 - 4.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 83 - 454 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …
Mazda CX-5
Vauxhall Astra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Vauxhall Astra

The Opel Astra strikes a neat balance between everyday practicality and engaging handling, so the daily grind suddenly feels a bit less dull. Inside it's intelligently packaged with modern kit and comfortable seating, making it a very sensible pick for buyers who want a dependable hatchback that doesn't take itself too seriously.

details
01_Opel-Astra-518263
05_Opel-Astra-518267
24_Opel-Astra-518297

Reviews Vauxhall Astra

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Opel Astra
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Vauxhall Astra and Toyota Corolla are two of the most practical compact family cars on the market, each offering a blend of efficiency, comfort and everyday usability. The Astra leans toward a livelier driving feel and value-packed equipment, while the Corolla prioritises proven reliability, …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Opel Astra
Opel Corsa
VS
In an exciting head-to-head matchup, the Opel Astra and Opel Corsa showcase their unique strengths in the compact car segment. The Astra impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, making it a perfect choice for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the more compact …
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-5 are two popular compact SUVs — the NX emphasizes luxury and refinement while the CX-5 focuses on sporty handling and strong value. This short comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model excels in comfort, technology, fuel economy, and driving feel so …
Mazda CX-5
Vauxhall Astra

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
28,300 - 37,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.2 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 454 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 130 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,438 - 1,733 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
438 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
130 - 196 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, D, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Vauxhall
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.