VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Suzuki Swace?

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • only slightly more power
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is barely cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,886 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers only slightly more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Swace is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 9.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is moderately lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 154 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers noticeably more boot space – 596 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 130 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries significantly more – 601 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 241 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Swace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£31,877
Swace

Suzuki Swace

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 …
Mazda CX-5
Omoda 5
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Omoda 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Omoda 5 is …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.