VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-60 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £. That’s a price difference of around 19980 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mazda CX-60 performs slight better – achieving up to 64 km, about 1 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.

Range Rover Velar @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a a bit edge – offering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls slightly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is minimal lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slight more room – 570 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – up to 1726 L, which is about 368 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar exemplifies a harmonious blend of elegance and capability, capturing the essence of modern luxury SUVs. Its sleek silhouette and refined design details make it stand out on both urban roads and off-road adventures. Inside, the Velar offers an impeccably crafted interior, combining premium materials with cutting-edge technology for a sophisticated driving experience.

details
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
CX-60
Range Rover Velar

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
61900 - 87400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
110 - 232 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4797 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1933 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.