Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 62,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,300 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-60 offers barely more range – reaching up to 63 km, about 5 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers somewhat more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers a bit more torque with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is only slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,003 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries very slightly more – 612 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
58 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
103 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,933 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.