What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on the version, the Mazda CX-60 delivers up to 327 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda CX-60 in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 3.80 L.

What is the Mazda CX-60’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 63 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on configuration, up to 570 L fit inside.

What drivetrain options does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar have?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar deliver on the road?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches a peak output of 404 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.80 L.

How many kWh does the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 15.40 kWh.

How fast can the Land Rover Range Rover Velar go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 250 km/h.

What is the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 552 L fit inside.

What are the Land Rover Range Rover Velar’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4797 mm long, 1933 mm wide and 1657 mm high.

Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-60 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18214 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 3.80 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

The electric range is almost identical – both manage about 63 km on a single charge.

Range Rover Velar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a a bit edge – offering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls slightly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is minimal lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slight more room – 570 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-60

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …

Mazda CX-5

Mazda CX-60

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 43700 - 57900 £	Price 61900 - 87400 £
Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L	Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 10.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 63 km	Electric Range 63 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 15.40 kWh
co2 85 - 137 g/km	co2 110 - 232 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 62 - 83 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1890 - 2055 kg	Curb weight 2003 - 2280 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L	Trunk capacity 503 - 552 L
Length -	Length 4797 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1933 mm
Height -	Height 1657 - 1665 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1335 - 1358 L
Payload 581 - 612 kg	Payload 460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP	Power HP 204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 209 - 250 km/h
Torque 450 - 550 Nm	Torque 430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 147 - 241 kW	Power kW 150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1997 - 2997 cm3