Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar fits your lifestyle better.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-60 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £. That’s a price difference of around 19980 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Mazda CX-60 performs slight better – achieving up to 64 km, about 1 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a a bit edge – offering 404 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls slightly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is minimal lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slight more room – 570 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – up to 1726 L, which is about 368 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.
detailsThe Land Rover Range Rover Velar exemplifies a harmonious blend of elegance and capability, capturing the essence of modern luxury SUVs. Its sleek silhouette and refined design details make it stand out on both urban roads and off-road adventures. Inside, the Velar offers an impeccably crafted interior, combining premium materials with cutting-edge technology for a sophisticated driving experience.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.