VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Lynk & Co 08 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 48,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Lynk & Co 08?

Mazda CX-60 vs Lynk & Co 08: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

Lynk & Co 08

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Lynk & Co 08 costs 48,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,324 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 08 uses 0.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 08 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 200 km, about 137 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

08

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 08 offers barely more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Lynk & Co 08 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,112 kg. The difference is around 222 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries a bit more – 612 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 08 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,000
08

Lynk & Co 08

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 200 km
Mazda CX-60
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Lynk & Co 08

The Lynk & Co 08 represents a bold leap in automotive design, merging a sleek and modern exterior with a spacious and tech-savvy interior that caters to the needs of contemporary drivers. Its innovative approach to connectivity and user experience sets it apart in a crowded market, offering drivers an unparalleled level of interaction and customization. With a strong focus on sustainability, this model features advanced hybrid technology, underscoring Lynk & Co's commitment to eco-friendly driving solutions.

details
Mazda CX-60
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
48,000 - 51,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
200 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
23 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,112 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
540 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,915 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
500 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
257 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Lynk & Co
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.