VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes C-Class Sedan – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-60 meets Mercedes C-Class Sedan.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes C-Class Sedan has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41200 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 739 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mercedes C-Class Sedan with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan performs convincingly better – achieving up to 117 km, about 53 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

C-Class Sedan @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan has a decisively edge – offering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan performs evident better – reaching 280 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes C-Class Sedan pulls convincingly stronger with 1020 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 470 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mercedes C-Class Sedan is slightly lighter – 1695 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 195 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers evident more room – 570 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,200
21C0295_008

Mercedes C-Class Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 183 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9 L
  • Electric Range : 11 - 117 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Mercedes C-Class Sedan

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class Sedan embodies a seamless blend of luxury and performance, capturing the quintessential essence of sophisticated driving. Its elegant design is complemented by a meticulously crafted interior, featuring premium materials and innovative technology to enhance comfort and convenience. On the road, the C-Class Saloon offers an impressive driving experience, harmonising precise handling with a composed and comfortable ride.

details
21C0295_008 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0295_012 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0295_018 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0297_041 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
21C0297_069 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes C-Class Sedan
CX-60
C-Class Sedan

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
41200 - 103100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
11 - 117 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.50 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
41 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 66 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1695 - 2195 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
280 - 455 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4751 - 4842 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1820 - 1900 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1438 - 1458 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
480 - 570 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
183 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
230 - 280 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 1020 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
135 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 - 1999 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, D, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these models comes down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value and reliability in their own right.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, the decision between these two popular models will hinge on individual preferences for performance versus everyday functionality.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.