VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQB comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes EQB?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQB: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mercedes EQB

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQB costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,198 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQB offers considerably more range – reaching up to 535 km, about 472 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

EQB

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers moderately more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes EQB takes 6.2 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,105 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 495 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries noticeably more – 612 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 177 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQB stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQB

Mercedes EQB

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 468 - 535 km
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQB

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Mercedes EQB

The Mercedes EQB is an electric compact SUV that dresses Mercedes' premium feel in practical clothing, with flexible seating and a serene, composed ride that turns everyday errands into a small luxury. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but for buyers who want a smart, spacious and well-made EV with tasteful tech and real-world usability, the EQB is a sensible, slightly buttoned-up choice that impresses without shouting.

details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQB

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
45,900 - 58,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
468 - 535 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,105 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
-
Length
4,684 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
1,654 - 1,689 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,710 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
435 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 8.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.