Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 196 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer?
Mazda CX-60 vs Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,680 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer offers substantially more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 382 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Astra Sports Tourer
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 196 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer is noticeably lighter – 1,438 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 452 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer offers barely more boot space – 597 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries somewhat more – 612 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,000
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Mazda CX-60
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
The Opel Astra Sports Tourer blends family-friendly practicality with a sleek, grown-up wagon silhouette that manages to be both useful and unexpectedly stylish. It’s an easy car to live with — comfortable, well put together and clever with space — a sensible choice for buyers who want everyday versatility without fuss.
details
Mazda CX-60
Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
30,000 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
82 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,438 - 1,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 597 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
434 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 196 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, D, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.