Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,498 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers substantially more range – reaching up to 284 km, about 221 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Kangoo Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 205 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is slightly lighter – 1,639 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 251 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries clearly more – 901 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 289 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
Mazda CX-60
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.