Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Renault Trafic Transporter?
Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Trafic Transporter is moderately cheaper – starting at 38,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,574 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Trafic Transporter offers substantially more range – reaching up to 318 km, about 255 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Trafic Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Trafic Transporter is barely lighter – 1,848 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 42 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries clearly more – 1,222 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 610 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Renault Trafic Transporter
The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.
details
Mazda CX-60
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.