VS

Mazda CX-60 vs SsangYong Rexton – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or SsangYong Rexton?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

SsangYong Rexton has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 6.80 L per 100 km.

Rexton @ Ssangyong

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 4.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs somewhat better – reaching 219 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls somewhat stronger with 550 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 109 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 255 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers noticeable more room – 784 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 214 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton performs a bit better – up to 1977 L, which is about 251 L more than the Mazda CX-60.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton distinct takes the win – 770 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 158 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton stands out in the SUV segment with its robust design and commanding presence on the road. It offers a spacious interior with high-quality materials, providing comfort and practicality for both driver and passengers. The Rexton combines off-road capability with modern technology, making it an attractive option for those seeking a versatile and durable vehicle.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi @ Ssangyong
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi @ Ssangyong
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi @ Ssangyong
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi @ Ssangyong
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi @ Ssangyong

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
SsangYong Rexton
CX-60
Rexton

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4850 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1825 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2157 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2021 - 2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SsangYong

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these models comes down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value and reliability in their own right.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 shines with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, offering a sportier alternative to the more minimalist Volvo XC40. While the XC40 impresses with its robust safety features and premium interior materials, the CX-60 caters to those seeking a more connected driving experience paired with versatile cargo space. Ultimately, the choice between these two sophisticated vehicles depends on whether you prioritize driving pleasure or a refined, tech-savvy cabin.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.