@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (327 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 46600 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo EC40?

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo EC40

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £. That’s a price difference of around 4715 £.

As for range, the Volvo EC40 performs decisively better – achieving up to 584 km, about 520 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

EC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a noticeable edge – offering 442 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo EC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EC40 pulls somewhat stronger with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is minimal lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers distinct more room – 570 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 166 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs evident better – up to 1726 L, which is about 530 L more than the Volvo EC40.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 177 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo EC40 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo EC40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £46,600
EC40 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
details
Mazda CX-60
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo EC40

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EC40
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the latest comparison of the Volvo EC40 and Skoda Elroq, both vehicles showcase impressive electric capabilities and distinctive styling that cater to modern drivers. The EC40 stands out with its minimalist interior and advanced safety features, while the Elroq offers a balance of practicality …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo EC40
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
EC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
46600 - 59000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4440 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1873 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1591 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX2
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning segment of electric SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and technology offerings. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and luxurious interior, making it a dynamic choice for driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the EC40 emphasizes …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EC40
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
VS
In the highly competitive electric SUV market, the Volvo EC40 and Polestar 4 offer distinctive approaches to design and performance. The EC40 impresses with its practicality, spacious interior, and commitment to sustainability, making it a strong choice for environmentally-conscious drivers. …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.