Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo V90 – Differences & prices compared
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-60 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Volvo V90 costs 62300 £. That’s a price difference of around 20400 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo V90 manages with 0.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo V90 performs distinct better – achieving up to 88 km, about 24 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
V90
@ Volvo Cars
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V90 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V90 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo V90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V90 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2075 kg. The difference is around 185 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers to a small extent more room – 570 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – up to 1726 L, which is about 272 L more than the Volvo V90.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo V90 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo V90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £62,300
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V90
Mazda CX-60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Volvo V90
The Volvo V90 blends Scandinavian elegance with estate practicality, delivering a composed ride and an interior that's both luxurious and perfectly sensible. Packed with clever storage and top-flight safety kit, it's the choice for buyers who want to look classy while hauling life's chaos — without making a fuss about it.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
Mazda CX-60
Volvo V90
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
62300 - 71700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
18 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
2075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
488 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4945 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1472 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1454 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
398 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
659 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
293 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.