Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-60 meets Volvo XC90.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
The SUV market is replete with options that bridge luxury, performance, and practicality. Among the notable contenders for 2024, the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC90 stand out as prime examples of innovation and intelligent engineering. Both models deliver compelling packages, each tailored to a distinct type of driver.
The Mazda CX-60 offers both plug-in hybrid and diesel mild-hybrid options. With a power output ranging from 200 to 327 HP, this SUV provides versatility for varying driving preferences. Its all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive configurations promise agility, further enhanced by its outstanding acceleration—reaching from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds for its top variant. The power delivery is smooth, courtesy of its automatic gearbox.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 is equipped with petrol mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. This SUV takes the lead in power with its top variant offering a robust 455 HP. The XC90 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a rapid 5.4 seconds, proving that performance is integral to its design. Volvo's focus on seamless power transition is evident in its advanced automatic transmission system.
Both vehicles showcase cutting-edge technologies. The Mazda CX-60 embraces efficient drivetrains, resulting in a fuel consumption as low as 1.4 L/100km for the hybrid model, paired with an electric range of 64 km. The CO2 emissions sit comfortably between 31 and 139 g/km, meeting contemporary environmental needs.
Volvo's XC90 is known for its 71 km electric range from a 14.7 kWh battery, backed by a consumption of just 1.2 L/100km in hybrid mode. Producing only 30 g/km of CO2 in this setup, it aligns with today's demands for eco-friendliness and sustainability.
Mazda's CX-60 design philosophy embraces simplicity yet sophistication. With a length of 4745 mm and a trunk capacity of 570 L, it meets family and travel needs effortlessly. Meanwhile, its dimensions provide a comfortable ride height and an impressive payload of up to 612 kg.
The Volvo XC90 stands as a monumental presence in the SUV segment, with a greater length of 4953 mm and a sleek, urban styling. Despite a smaller trunk capacity of up to 302 L, it offers seven seats, providing ample space for larger families and group travels. An impressive payload capacity of 710 kg underscores its utility-focused design.
When comparing the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC90, driver priorities define the ideal choice. The CX-60 provides remarkable fuel efficiency and a spirited driving experience, perfect for those valuing practicality and performance. Meanwhile, the XC90 epitomizes power and prestige, with technology and innovation embedded deeply into its core design, making it a suitable companion for environmentally conscious families seeking style and substance.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-60 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 27857 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo XC90 performs slight better – achieving up to 71 km, about 7 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is to a small extent lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers convincingly more room – 570 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs minimal better – up to 1856 L, which is about 130 L more than the Mazda CX-60.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 slightly takes the win – 710 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 98 kg.
Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España