Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 69,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Volvo XC90?
The SUV market is replete with options that bridge luxury, performance, and practicality. Among the notable contenders for 2024, the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC90 stand out as prime examples of innovation and intelligent engineering. Both models deliver compelling packages, each tailored to a distinct type of driver.
The Mazda CX-60 offers both plug-in hybrid and diesel mild-hybrid options. With a power output ranging from 200 to 327 HP, this SUV provides versatility for varying driving preferences. Its all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive configurations promise agility, further enhanced by its outstanding acceleration—reaching from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds for its top variant. The power delivery is smooth, courtesy of its automatic gearbox.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 is equipped with petrol mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. This SUV takes the lead in power with its top variant offering a robust 455 HP. The XC90 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a rapid 5.4 seconds, proving that performance is integral to its design. Volvo's focus on seamless power transition is evident in its advanced automatic transmission system.
Both vehicles showcase cutting-edge technologies. The Mazda CX-60 embraces efficient drivetrains, resulting in a fuel consumption as low as 1.4 L/100km for the hybrid model, paired with an electric range of 64 km. The CO2 emissions sit comfortably between 31 and 139 g/km, meeting contemporary environmental needs.
Volvo's XC90 is known for its 71 km electric range from a 14.7 kWh battery, backed by a consumption of just 1.2 L/100km in hybrid mode. Producing only 30 g/km of CO2 in this setup, it aligns with today's demands for eco-friendliness and sustainability.
Mazda's CX-60 design philosophy embraces simplicity yet sophistication. With a length of 4745 mm and a trunk capacity of 570 L, it meets family and travel needs effortlessly. Meanwhile, its dimensions provide a comfortable ride height and an impressive payload of up to 612 kg.
The Volvo XC90 stands as a monumental presence in the SUV segment, with a greater length of 4953 mm and a sleek, urban styling. Despite a smaller trunk capacity of up to 302 L, it offers seven seats, providing ample space for larger families and group travels. An impressive payload capacity of 710 kg underscores its utility-focused design.
When comparing the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC90, driver priorities define the ideal choice. The CX-60 provides remarkable fuel efficiency and a spirited driving experience, perfect for those valuing practicality and performance. Meanwhile, the XC90 epitomizes power and prestige, with technology and innovation embedded deeply into its core design, making it a suitable companion for environmentally conscious families seeking style and substance.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-60 is substantially cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,091 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC90 uses 3.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC90 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 71 km, about 8 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers noticeably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is somewhat lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more boot space – 570 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries somewhat more – 710 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 98 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
69,800 - 84,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,953 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,856 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España