VS

Mazda CX-60 vs VW Caddy Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 25,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or VW Caddy Compact Van?

Mazda CX-60 vs VW Caddy Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Caddy Compact Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,850 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the VW Caddy Compact Van offers significantly more range – reaching up to 120 km, about 57 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Caddy Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 448 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy Compact Van carries slightly more – 759 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 147 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Caddy Compact Van is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,800
Caddy Compact Van

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 117 - 120 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-60
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Caddy Compact Van

The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife

Reviews VW Caddy Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Nissan X-Trail compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
628 - 759 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.