VS

Mazda CX-60 vs VW Caddy Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (43700 £ vs 25800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or VW Caddy Compact Van?

Mazda CX-60 vs VW Caddy Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • convincingly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • noticeable lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Caddy Compact Van has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17850 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Caddy Compact Van manages with 0.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the VW Caddy Compact Van performs significantly better – achieving up to 120 km, about 57 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Caddy Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a significantly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls convincingly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm difference.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers decisively more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is noticeable lighter – 1442 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 448 kg.

When it comes to payload, VW Caddy Compact Van somewhat takes the win – 759 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 147 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £25,800
Caddy Compact Van

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 6.8 L
  • Electric Range : 117 - 120 km
details

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

VW Caddy Compact Van

The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews VW Caddy Compact Van

Mazda CX-60
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
43700 - 57900 £
Price
25800 - 42300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1442 - 1818 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4500 - 4853 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
-
Height
1819 - 1823 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 3700 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
628 - 759 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tiguan
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and VW Tiguan compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Genesis GV70 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.