VS

Mazda CX-60 vs VW Passat – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or VW Passat?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Passat has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35700 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 6171 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Passat manages with 0.30 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 1.40 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the VW Passat performs decisively better – achieving up to 133 km, about 69 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Passat @ volkswagen-newsroom.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a to a small extent edge – offering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.80 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

In terms of top speed, the VW Passat performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls noticeable stronger with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Passat is noticeable lighter – 1573 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 317 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW Passat offers to a small extent more room – 690 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Passat performs to a small extent better – up to 1920 L, which is about 194 L more than the Mazda CX-60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 minimal takes the win – 612 kg compared to 577 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW Passat proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Passat is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £35,700
DB2019AU00685_large

VW Passat

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.3 - 8 L
  • Electric Range : 124 - 133 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

VW Passat

The VW Passat is a staple in the family saloon segment, known for its refined design and practicality. It effortlessly combines a comfortable ride with a spacious interior, making it a popular choice for long journeys. The cabin features high-quality materials and an intuitive infotainment system, providing a premium feel without sacrificing user-friendliness.

details
DB2019AU00685_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2019AU00698_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2019AU00117_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com
DB2019AU00642_large @ volkswagen-newsroom.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
VW Passat
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Passat and VW Tayron showcase distinct strengths tailored to different driver preferences. The Passat excels in providing a spacious sedan experience with a focus on comfort and refinement, making it ideal for long journeys. In contrast, the Tayron offers a more dynamic and compact SUV profile, appealing to those seeking versatility and a higher driving position without compromising on style.
Mazda CX-60
VW Passat
CX-60
Passat

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
35700 - 58500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
0.3 - 8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
124 - 133 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
7 - 181 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 66 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1573 - 1858 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4917 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1849 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1521 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1770 - 1920 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
501 - 577 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
122 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
212 - 250 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
90 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
VW Golf Variant
VW Passat
VS
In the ever-competitive segment of family cars, the VW Golf Variant and VW Passat stand out for their practicality and performance. While the Golf Variant offers a sporty design and agile handling combined with ample cargo space, the Passat impresses with its spacious interior and refined driving experience. Ultimately, choosing between these two versatile models comes down to personal preference, whether you prioritize compact agility or expansive comfort.
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
VW Arteon
VW Passat
VS
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.