VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Mercedes EQB comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Mercedes EQB?

Mazda CX-6e vs Mercedes EQB: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

  • only slightly cheaper
details

Mercedes EQB

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-6e is only slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQB costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,021 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQB is noticeably more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQB offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 535 km, about 51 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

EQB

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQB offers moderately more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQB is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.2 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQB delivers clearly more torque with 520 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQB is marginally lighter – 2,105 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 100 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQB offers marginally more boot space – 495 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQB carries moderately more – 435 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQB holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQB

Mercedes EQB

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 468 - 535 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-6e
Mercedes EQB

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes EQB

The Mercedes EQB is an electric compact SUV that dresses Mercedes' premium feel in practical clothing, with flexible seating and a serene, composed ride that turns everyday errands into a small luxury. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but for buyers who want a smart, spacious and well-made EV with tasteful tech and real-world usability, the EQB is a sensible, slightly buttoned-up choice that impresses without shouting.

details
21C0680_006
21C0680_005
21C0680_002
21C0680_078
21C0680_052

Reviews Mercedes EQB

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan
4 Dec 2025, 21:05:57

A bit boring and no longer up-to-date with its slow charging speed...

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQB
Mercedes GLB
VS
The Mercedes EQB and Mercedes GLB target the same compact‑SUV buyers but take very different routes: the EQB is the all‑electric choice while the GLB relies on conventional petrol/diesel and mild‑hybrid engines. This quick comparison looks at driving character, interior practicality, range and …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Kia EV3
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV3 and the Mazda CX-6e comes down to what you value most — practicality, range and efficiency, or driving engagement and a more premium cabin. The EV3 leans toward efficient electric practicality and strong value, while the CX-6e emphasizes Mazda’s signature driving …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
Toyota C-HR+
Mazda CX-6e
VS
This comparison pits the Toyota C-HR+ against the Mazda CX-6e to help you choose between Toyota’s sharp, design-led compact crossover and Mazda’s more driver-focused, likely electrified alternative. We’ll focus on real-world economy, interior comfort, driving dynamics and ownership costs so you can …
Mazda CX-6e
Mercedes EQB

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
45,900 - 58,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
468 - 535 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
2,105 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
-
Length
4,684 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
1,654 - 1,689 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,710 L
Payload
385 kg
Payload
435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 8.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.