VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Mercedes GLC EQ comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 61,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Mercedes GLC EQ?

Mazda CX-6e vs Mercedes GLC EQ: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-6e is considerably cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,250 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 230 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

GLC EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers substantially more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 231 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 510 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-6e is moderately lighter – 2,205 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 330 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers somewhat more boot space – 570 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC EQ carries markedly more – 505 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 645 - 714 km
Mazda CX-6e
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
Mazda CX-6e
Mercedes GLC EQ

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.