VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Skoda Epiq comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 211 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Skoda Epiq?

Mazda CX-6e vs Skoda Epiq: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

  • moderately more power
  • only slightly more electric range
details

Skoda Epiq

  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Epiq is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,648 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Epiq is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 44 km more than the Skoda Epiq.

Epiq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers moderately more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 211 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Epiq is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Epiq is clearly lighter – 1,625 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 580 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Epiq offers only slightly more boot space – 475 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Epiq carries somewhat more – 455 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Epiq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,200
Epiq

Skoda Epiq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 211 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 440 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the Skoda Elroq and the Skoda Epiq helps you weigh practical, compact crossover usability against a more spacious, tech-focused alternative from Skoda. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, efficiency, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your needs.
BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-6e
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Epiq

The Skoda Epiq is a sensible, well-packaged compact SUV that delivers a roomy cabin, practical storage and an easygoing driving character suited to everyday life. It prioritizes comfort and value with smart, user-friendly features rather than flashy performance.

details
113_skoda_epiq_58690d36-1920x1280
114_skoda_epiq_ff280ddc-1920x1281
040_skoda_epiq_dd6d8412-1920x1281
036_skoda_epiq_dc424056-1920x1440
041_skoda_epiq_9207c105-1920x1281
042_skoda_epiq_8c0688b5-1920x1457
048_skoda_epiq_8179f162-1920x1690

Reviews Skoda Epiq

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Raval
Skoda Epiq
VS
The Cupra Raval vs Skoda Epiq comparison places a sporty, driver-focused compact crossover against a sensible, practical contender aimed at everyday usability. I’ll break down performance, interior quality, technology and running costs so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
VW ID.Polo
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the VW ID. Polo and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which one fits your driving needs and budget. I’ll cut through the spec sheets and focus on real-world driving, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick with confidence.
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Kia EV2
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV2 and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a more refined, family-friendly driving experience. I’ll compare the key points—range and charging, interior space, features and running costs—so you can see which one fits your …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
VW ID.3
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Epiq pits two compact electric hatchbacks against each other: both suit city drivers and small families but prioritise different strengths. The ID.3 leans toward a refined, tech-focused driving experience, while the Epiq emphasises practical space, clever packaging and …
Renault R4
Skoda Epiq
VS
This comparison pits the Renault R4 against the Skoda Epiq, helping you choose between Renault’s compact, characterful offering and Skoda’s modern, tech-focused alternative. I’ll focus on the things that matter in real ownership—space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs—so you can see which …
Mazda CX-6e
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
438 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.