Compare performance (327 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 77,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or BMW X5?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the evolving realm of high-performance SUVs, the BMW X5 and the Mazda CX-80 emerge as significant contenders. Both vehicles offer a mix of power, efficiency, and luxury, catering to different tastes and requirements. Here, we dive deep into their technical attributes and innovations.
The 2023-2024 BMW X5 offers a myriad of engine options, establishing itself as a versatile powerhouse. With engine types ranging from Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV to Plugin Hybrid, it boasts a formidable power spread between 298 HP to an exhilarating 625 HP. This power translates to acceleration of 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 3.9 seconds for top models, reaching maximum speeds of up to 250 km/h.
In contrast, the 2024 Mazda CX-80 opts for a streamlined approach with two engine types: Plugin Hybrid and Diesel MHEV. Sporting up to 327 HP, it offers a smooth transition from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds, with top speeds peaking at 219 km/h. Mazda's engine emphasizes efficiency over raw power, with consumption rates as low as 1.6 L/100km, making it an environmentally conscious choice.
Both SUVs focus on comfort and utility, but they cater to slightly different audience sizes. The BMW X5 offers seating for 5, complemented by a generous trunk capacity of up to 650 liters, making it ideal for small families or individuals seeking luxury and space. The interior houses high-end materials and cutting-edge technology, all designed to create an exceptional driving experience.
The CX-80 focuses on family or group adventures with its 7-seat arrangement. Although it offers a smaller trunk capacity of 258 liters, it accommodates larger groups without compromising comfort. Mazda's interior balances practicality with modern tech, ensuring an engaging ride for all passengers.
In terms of size, the BMW X5 measures approximately 4948 mm in length, 2015 mm in width, and a height of 1762 mm, exuding a robust and assertive road presence. Its design is both athletic and luxurious, a testament to BMW's hallmark style.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-80, slightly longer at 4995 mm, with a width of 1890 mm and a height of 1714 mm, presents a more streamlined appearance. Its sleek design is tailored for aerodynamics while retaining a comfortable cabin space.
In the tech arena, both SUVs are aligned with contemporary needs and futures. The BMW X5 integrates features such as advanced driver-assist systems, cutting-edge infotainment setups, and a 25.7 kWh battery capacity offering an impressive electric range of 97 km.
The Mazda CX-80 capitalizes on its efficient engineering, equipped with modern infotainment systems and safety technologies to ensure driver and passenger security. Its electric range of 60 km from the plugin hybrid model is noteworthy for city commuting and short trips.
The choice between the BMW X5 and Mazda CX-80 ultimately hinges on what the buyer prioritizes: the X5 offers unparalleled luxury and power, perfect for those seeking a premium experience. The CX-80, on the other hand, provides an economical and spacious solution for families needing versatility and comfort.
Both SUVs are marvels of engineering, each excelling in their respective spheres. Whether you lean towards high-end performance or practical economy, both BMW and Mazda deliver excellence on the road.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the BMW X5 costs 77,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,243 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X5 uses 3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW X5 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 105 km, about 45 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 offers considerably more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 298 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X5 delivers markedly more torque with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is barely lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,240 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X5 offers considerably more boot space – 650 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 392 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X5 carries marginally more – 705 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
The BMW X5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
77,600 - 144,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
105 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
68 - 289 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
2,240 - 2,495 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,004 - 2,015 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
565 - 705 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España