VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • moderately lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is moderately cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,043 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers moderately more range – reaching up to 67 km, about 7 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers moderately more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers very slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is moderately lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 339 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers substantially more boot space – 472 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 214 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15)
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Mercedes GLC and the Range Rover Evoque are two leading compact luxury SUVs that balance premium comfort with everyday practicality. This comparison will help you decide whether the GLC’s composed handling and refined interior or the Evoque’s striking design and off-road capability better suits …
BMW X1
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Omoda 5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Omoda 5 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
In the competitive compact luxury SUV segment, the Audi Q5 stands out with its refined handling and advanced technology features, delivering a smooth and engaging driving experience. Conversely, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque impresses with its distinctive styling and off-road capabilities, …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
BMW X4
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the BMW X4 or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
In the competitive landscape of luxury SUVs, the Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stand out with their distinctive blend of style and performance. The F-Pace impresses with its athletic handling and spacious interior, while the Evoque captivates with its rugged charm and advanced …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.