VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes EQE SUV comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 71,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes EQE SUV?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes EQE SUV: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

Mercedes EQE SUV

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,225 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers substantially more range – reaching up to 611 km, about 551 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

EQE SUV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers clearly more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 298 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQE SUV delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is a bit lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,440 kg. The difference is around 309 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers significantly more boot space – 520 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 262 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQE SUV is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £71,600
EQE SUV

Mercedes EQE SUV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 453 - 611 km
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes EQE SUV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Mercedes EQE SUV

The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.

details
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes EQE SUV

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
71,600 - 125,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,440 - 2,615 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
520 L
Length
-
Length
4,863 - 4,879 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,940 mm
Height
-
Height
1,672 - 1,685 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,675 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
505 - 580 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.