VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 50,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes GLC?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • marginally cheaper

Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • considerably more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is marginally cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 999 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLC uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC offers substantially more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 654 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

GLC

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC delivers significantly more torque with 1,020 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 470 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes GLC is a bit lighter – 1,910 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 221 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers considerably more boot space – 620 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 362 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries barely more – 650 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £50,300
GLC

Mercedes GLC

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 12 - 714 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
VS
Unsure whether the Mercedes GLC or the Volvo EX60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

details
22C0270_060
22C0270_055
22C0270_051
22C0270_046
22C0270_031

Reviews Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marek
2 Jan 2026, 18:32:30

There’s something about a Mercedes — you have to take it for a spin to feel it and understand why it’s special.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
When comparing the Mercedes GLC to the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, both vehicles offer a luxurious SUV experience, but cater to slightly different preferences. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its refined interior and cutting-edge technology, appealing to those who value comfort and connectivity. …
Mercedes GLC
Toyota RAV4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mercedes GLC and the Toyota RAV4, the luxurious GLC excels in offering a refined driving experience and premium interior materials that define its upscale appeal. Meanwhile, the RAV4 impresses with its practicality, reliability, and advanced safety features, …
Honda CR-V
Mercedes GLC
VS
In the competitive cross-over landscape, the Honda CR-V and Mercedes GLC both offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Honda CR-V stands out with its practicality, excellent fuel economy, and affordable pricing, making it an ideal choice for families seeking reliability without breaking the …
Mercedes GLC
Mercedes E Class
VS
In the world of luxury vehicles, the Mercedes GLC and the Mercedes E-Klasse both offer a blend of elegance and performance, yet cater to different driving experiences. The GLC, a compact luxury SUV, delivers versatility and a commanding road presence with its higher stance, making it ideal for …
Mercedes GLC
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive segment of mid-size SUVs, the Mercedes GLC stands out with its luxurious interiors and cutting-edge technology, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and refinement. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers remarkable practicality and excellent value for money, …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
50,300 - 126,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
12 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 221 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 65 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Length
-
Length
4,716 - 4,845 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,890 - 1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
1,603 - 1,644 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,490 - 1,740 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
475 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
186 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
210 - 275 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
320 - 1,020 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
137 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,991 - 2,989 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, D, B, E, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.