Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 472 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 50,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes GLC?
Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLC: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-80 is marginally cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 999 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLC uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC offers substantially more range – reaching up to 128 km, about 68 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
GLC
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers noticeably more power – delivering 472 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC delivers noticeably more torque with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes GLC is very slightly lighter – 1,985 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers considerably more boot space – 620 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 362 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes GLC is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £50,300
Mercedes GLC
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC blends quiet refinement with premium materials to create a comfortable, modern cabin that feels more upscale than its size might suggest. It delivers composed handling and confident on-road manners while offering practical versatility and a strong suite of driver assistance and infotainment features.
details
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLC
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
122 - 128 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
41 - 214 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,400 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
475 - 575 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
186 - 472 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
137 - 347 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, G
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.