VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLE comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 585 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 78,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes GLE?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes GLE: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Mercedes GLE

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is significantly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Mercedes GLE costs 78,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,584 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLE uses 3.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLE offers considerably more range – reaching up to 104 km, about 44 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

GLE

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLE offers clearly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLE is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLE delivers noticeably more torque with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLE offers considerably more boot space – 655 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 397 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLE carries a bit more – 770 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLE holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £78,900
GLE

Mercedes GLE

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 309 - 585 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.2 - 10.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 91 - 104 km
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLE

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Mercedes GLE

The Mercedes GLE blends luxurious comfort with a confident road presence, wrapping tech and refinement in an SUV shape that still knows how to behave on a twisty back road. Inside it's plush and quiet, with clever storage and driver aids that make long trips effortless — plus the badge gives it that easy-to-respect curb appeal.

details
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLE

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
78,900 - 115,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.2 - 10.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
91 - 104 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
72 - 241 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,815 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
485 - 655 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,010 - 2,018 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
495 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
309 - 585 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
560 - 750 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
227 - 430 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,989 - 2,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.